this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
50 points (96.3% liked)

politics

30954 readers
2121 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I think the idea that Trump is "an idiot" or that he surrounds himself "with idiots" is partly true. But, I just think this description is overly simplistic and, at times, dangerous.

Trump is not an idiot when it comes to his own self interest. He is an idiot when it comes to ruling the country, being a leader, picking people for his administration that will serve their role well. Yes. But the problem is not with incompetence; it is with the misunderstanding of intent.

A "smart" leader would delegate tasks to others that they know are more competent than themselves in a given area of expertise. The "stupidity" of Trump that we define is that he doesn't do this. He actually appoints people that are extremely unqualified for the tasks.

But, this isn't Trump being stupid. He just has the priority of self enrichment and unquestioning loyalty. He isn't trying to govern in the way we are made to believe government should operate.

This DOES result in the administration getting stuck in clearly awful situations of their own making and own stupidity. Iran being the obvious example. But, the intent was never to "free Iran" or remove their nuclear capabilities. The intent was to enrich himself, his family, and the oligarchs of our nation. And, with each mistake the damage of the failure is not taken by them. It is taken by their intended targets and the working class of the world.

Their is no incentive or intent from Trump to rule for anything other than the enrichment of himself and the entire capitalist class. Having competent people that will tell you "no, this will not work" is not helpful when every goal Trump has is masked with a charade.

The military leadership telling him that an invasion of Iran is not feasible, that they will not "do regime change" organically, and that their is no intelligence indicating Iran is developing nuclear weapons; none of that is helpful to Trump. Because he doesn't care about any of those things beyond their use as justification for his own self enrichment and pursuit of feeling powerful.

So, of course he surrounds himself with "idiots" for lack of a better term. Because he doesn't need people that will say anything but "yes sir". He either needs people dumb enough to believe his lies and his justifications; or he needs people malicious enough to understand that his justifications are lies and have aligning self interest of enrichment. That is what his administration is filled with. And I think the later is far more common; though often not as public facing.

So, no, I don't think Trump is stupid. Beyond his obviously declining mental state. And I also don't think he ONLY surrounds himself with idiots yes men. He is primarily surrounded by smart narcissists that know how to play his game. They know that they can enrich themselves and obtain their selfish goals as long as they can offer enrichment for him in return.

Starting a trade war with Canada when gas prices are already a major issue may seem "dumb". But it's only dumb if you're also dumb enough to believe that Trump is trying to be a good leader. Or that Trump and the people in his admin are willing to give up power at some point in the future. They are not. They have told us this endlessly. They are doing such blatant crimes in office that it is clear that they have no intention of letting anyone take power that would hold them accountable.

Edit: I'm using "enrichment" here a lot. This could mean anything from stock market manipulation, control/restriction of resources, genocide, etc. Anything that those that have Trump's ear could want. And most of these people aren't holding a title in his administration. They are the wealthy oligarchs that direct this country.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 4 points 3 hours ago

Reached for comment, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle told the Daily Beast in a frequently recycled statement: “Michael Wolff is a professional scumbag and serial liar whose brain has been completely warped by his severe and incurable disease known as Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

I feel like they aren’t even trying anymore.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Smart people will tell him “no” and give him reasons why and he doesn’t want to hear “no” or listen to reason, just wants to make every decision with his gut or do the opposite of what the democrats would do.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

The other side of it is that smart people will also not tell him "no" if their intention is to have the power of the presidency. They are smart enough to recognize this character trait about Trump. And they do not gain their power from a public facing persona. So they have no reason to not "bend the knee" and use Trump to get what they want for themselves.

And I think this is the largely missed part of how and why Trump operates and how he is a perfect leader for the oligarchs of this country. It's why his public relationship with Elon was so short lived. Elon wanted to be the public facing "smart guy" and Trump fucking hated it. Dealt with it for sometime because of the massive amounts of cash Elon gave his campaign. But ultimately, it ended because Trump hated it.

So Elon backed away from the public facing side and continues to get what he wants privately.

And this where the real Trump administration is. It is in the hands of the billionaires that direct him. It is not in the stupid public facing figures that lie to us on the media everyday. They are there to say "yes sir" and pass the message down the line. And sometimes take the fall when public outrage is too high. That's it. They are perfect for the role they are meant to fill.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

According to search, Trump has never released his IQ score. As a people, are we entitled to know his IQ? We pay for his healthcare.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

“Man, woman, camera, ~~bear~~ giraffe.”

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)
[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 23 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It is obvious that he wishes to be the smartest in the room at least once in his life. Sadly this is futile as he does not know how to fire the inanimate objects that constantly outsmart him such as doors, desks, umbrellas and carpets.

[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Rumor has it that the paper clips are planning a coup over Trump. Yes, the US would be far better off even if run by Clippy.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Okay but why do bears shit in the woods?