this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
604 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

87708 readers
3852 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The gravitational pull is stronger on the left side so you have to account for that or else you'll just sail around in circles. /s

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 2 days ago

The device also has to account for the location of your mom.

/s

(sorry, I couldn't resist)

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Most sailors spend their whole lives sailing around in circles

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Easy to correct - just keep the Skipper in the center of the boat. Gilligan's pull is negligible.

[–] mig@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

What in the dickins?!

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We're gonna need a bigger drone.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Eh, boat or submarine drones can be as big as you want, and the device will only get smaller (and better).

[–] time2lose@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Quantum freaks me out.
How can we possibly make a point we are not in a simulation.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, can you make any predictions about the future state of the simulation from present and the rules you think you've got right? Just because it is something "computed" from a previous state doesn't mean that you can compute it yourself...and...if you can't make predictions...it is just conjecture (limited by our imagination of the state of the art, which now is a simulation, but it used to be god's creation, then clockwork, then a machine, now a computer/simulation. I can't imagine what the conjecture will become in the future...hopefully not some shitty spatial diffusion+LLM model where hallucinations are wavefunction collapse to unlikely values, lol.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago

Because it would be immensely stupid

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Wow, more AI. For some reason. This doesn't sound like it needs AI but the investors would pay less, of course!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›