this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
101 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31043 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senior data anallyst says the numbers have shwon no sign of recovery over several months.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

When the Republicans win the election, we'll know it was rigged

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't even understand how it's non-zero.

Oh, it's the racism, sexism, xenophobia and of course the current Faux fave: transphobia. That's about the only thing sustaining his numbers.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Hate and distraction

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 20 points 1 week ago

how's about we collectively fuck off with approval ratings until there are actual consequences for his actions?

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It also means that his base - about 1/3rd of the proof - will never abandon him.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago

That sounds right. There's a chunk of the population that just have broken brains and souls. They'll follow their king to the grave.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Which is unfortunately about the bar you need for authoritarianism. 1/3 of the people to actively support you and 1/3 of the people to do nothing and you're there.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

By comparison Friederich Merz, the German Chancellor, has a 13% approval rating. Emanuel Macron, the French President, has an approval rating of 18%

Meanwhile Trump never went under 35%.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think that's almost an inevitable mathematical difference between a two party system and multi party systems with n > 2.

The hardened center of a party won't abandon their guy at the head of the executive, so they form the floor for the approval rating. In a party ostensibly representing half the people, that hardened center will be large, and is apparently 35% large for the Republicans.

In comparison France has 8 relevant parties, Germany has 6 relevant parties (or 5 if we combine the Union, which is mostly just separated into Bayern/not-Bayern but otherwise the same). So their hardened centers will also be much smaller.

I don't really have much hope for the US system, this concentration of power with constant internal stalemating will eventually kill them. But the incumbent parties don't want to change the voting system. So there is no way out.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

But Europe still has thinking people. The US only has fanatic fan bases.

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 9 points 1 week ago

Hmm I think I've heard bad polling for Trump before

Yet I still drive by a shipping container sized poster of that stupid 'someone shot at me' photo op pic regularly

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

But if you just dismantle democracy you don't need the people's support. And that project is well underway.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If he holds on to power past January 2029, he won't need anyone's approval to do it.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'll believe it more when i start seeing people's garish trump signs come down.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where are you? I don't see any up, but I haven't in a while. We had a neighbor that flew a stupid donnie flag, but that came down sometime last year.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

In a rural and red depressed cesspool near a border in a purple state.

[–] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

We could have had our first woman president, but no....

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Not really relevant, polling anyways. Not like he's up for election and pretending he gave a shit about anyone other than himself, well youre probably part of the problem if youve have given that narrative any wind.

What does he care? He's got what he needed.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

No worries, shithead will replace shitforbrains on the next election as predicted by shitforbrains.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to Gallup Truman has the lowest approval rating at 22%. Trump isn't on empty yet.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Truman dropped two nukes and got blamed for ww2 without reason, if his approval wasn't low it would be odd.

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Paywalled, maybe I'm wrong. But no, it's not stuck on empty. It's stuck at 35%, pretty much the exact same as Biden during his term, and Trump during his first term. Approval ratings seem increasingly useless.