this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
506 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31051 readers
1983 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I now know I am OFFICIALLY on some sort of watchlist! Yippee!

The list is supposedly not exhaustive, but I recommend everyone to search your plate to see if you’ve been tracked. I worry for the safety of the women who have been searched more than 50 times by the same user.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

HaveIBeenStalked

Glad to see my bicycle isn't on the list

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 93 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Holy shit one officer in my town has 309 searches on one plate.

He(?) has the top number of searches in total, and (practically) the only person to search for the top four plates in my town. The rest have like 1-2 searches from other officers in the same or adjacent town.

Wtf is so special about these 4 plates?

We only have two cameras in my town (afaik), and they are on the highway on ramps.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like a question for the Mayor and city council.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 week ago

I contacted the police oversight committee. They report to the Governor and AG.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He’s divorced and those are his Xwife, her new boyfriend, and his two kids.

Maybe. But rolling the dice, that’s my 7.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 19 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't bet against you, that's for sure.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ex gf or wife or a chick who turned him down. Or a trans woman he is obsessed with.

[–] marzhall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or current wife who's he's paranoid is cheating with him. LOVEINT is fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

On the page, USA Today have a section saying if you see a plate that has a lot of searches they want to hear from you. Might be worth letting them know which plates/officer.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

If they have the data, they have the ability to compile that data to find the top searched plates....... this sounds like a way of getting more interaction.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 8 points 1 week ago

They mean if you're one of the plates being searched for a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Rookie numbers. This is what came from a search of my town:

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Seems worthy of contacting the reporter's mentioned on the site:

What if I'm in these records?

If your plate has been searched frequently or you recognize an officer frequently searching the same plate, we want to hear from you.

Contact reporters Austin Fast and Kenny Jacoby.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Neon_Carnivore@lemmy.zip 88 points 1 week ago (11 children)

The site blocks VPNs, and searching a plate might associate it with your IP address. I advise proceeding with extreme caution. I know it sounds paranoid, but given the state of things in America as of late...

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago

If you have Proton, Chicago Illinois #2 works.

[–] perpetualflight@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

Here is a searchable database that does work with a VPN

Have I Been Flocked

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's exchange plates and look up the other person's plate to confuse the system.

(I don't have a car and live in the EU)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh kids.

A VPN is only really good for plausable deniability. That is there is no direct correlation between the activity coming from an ISP's IP address that is directly connected to your billing profile, home address, etc.

There are countless ways your identity can be gleaned from your digital exhaust. Fingerprinting just takes maybe four or five attributes your browser will hand over and from there, you can be reasonably identified with a high level of certainty.

For example, you might be using a Safari browser, your resolution is known (browser spills the beans to render pages), operating system, details about how your device performs a TLS (encryption) handshake, timing, any browser add-ons you might use etc.

See for yourself: https://demo.fingerprint.com/playground; there are countless pages that show you the same, this is just one.

If you think that a VPN is going to act as some sort of anonymizer, I'm afraid you've been misled. Even the act of setting up a machine/browser to be properly anonymous will generate signals which will make you stick out like a sore thumb.

VPNs are one small slice of the pie, they help but they don't solve the problem of being identified online. If you're going to do something that you REALLY don't want anyone to see, you're going to have to spend a lot of time learning--which is a signal also.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A vpn is used in combination to other tech.

Trust me, I know they can't fingerprint me because I'm constantly getting told I'm a bot or served 403 errors on half the web today

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I am honestly impressed with USA Today for the first time in my life. Flock is fucked if these milquetoast bitches are with us.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What next, Teen Vogue or Buzzfeed?

(No but seriously I love when these places do hard hitting shit out of the blue, although it hasn't ended well in both cases).

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TMZ has been holding DC’s feet to the fire 100X more than any of the legacy media outlets this administration, too

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, how could I forget TMZ. It's so fucking backwards in 2026.

Locally, one of the most insane ones is food blogger LA Taco getting into ICE reporting and interviewing. Obviously when legacy media fails, people still try to step up.

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

BuzzFeed has (had?) a really random hard hitting journalism arm

I wouldn't be surprised if this kinda thing happens because they lack oversight since they expect nothing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 week ago
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These are all mostly red areas that are being stalked. Wild.

[–] TefikiMupu@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Completely predictable.

[–] mountaincalledmonkey@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago

downloadable db anywhere?

[–] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

Can’t tell. The city redacted all of the plates and usually leaves the reason blank. They have been getting called out for their willful disregard for accountability in other areas too, not that it does anything.

The county redacted 85% of the searches, which probably tracks with them doing legitimate work 20% of the time.

The goombas at the city airport spent the first year on it before suddenly realizing they could hide it. Looks like most of them were probably mostly professional and a couple were stalking.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Searching your plate adds it to the list. I bet.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

It’s adds you to the “interested to know if law enforcement has any interest in them USA Today Honeypot 2026” database, which probably marks your file as antifa or something

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

USA Today isn't exactly top notch news but what would they have to gain from feeding search data to the government? People on both sides of the aisle are pissed right now, hence the searchable database to begin with. Lots of women checking to see if their exes have been stalking them. This wouldn't be any kind of useful correlation to want the data on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Man, searching for words like "crime", "theft", or "warrant" really helps paint a picture of how fucking stupid cops are in this country

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

My county seems pretty chill, compared to most of these comments. That being said, I wish all flock cameras a very [redacted].

[–] Tooks@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Frederick Co VA top user has their information "redacted." Must be targeting minors (16-17 yr olds)

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Now you only need to find a few high profile GOP members going to see young women (or men, actually…) their wives never heard of, and Flock will be severely restricted within one week.

load more comments
view more: next ›