this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
467 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

87878 readers
2783 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 3 points 20 hours ago

Oh are they finally finding a wage approach profitability? I got to say, literally just scamming shoppers was...not at the bottom of my list.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Pichai, you fucking banchode.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This dystopia is terrible.

Next: AI knows your income level so it automatically raises prices to match.

Then: someone comes up with an income spoofing service for shopping. For a fee, of course.

Then: you have to add an income verification to browse internet shopping.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All of that is already in play and more.

They know your income, spending habits, outstanding credit balances, browsing history, etc. They know if you are employed, had a child, had a divorce or death in the family. They know your health and how active you are.

With all that data, AI knows what you are willing to spend on an item or service.

There are HR services that use AI to look at all of this meta data to determine how desperate you are for a job and how low they can offer a salary/wage.

You’re the product.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

They want one giant walled internet that is nothing more than a giant company town. You own nothing. Every dollar you earn is consumed by the system that knows how much it can take.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This isn't just google; it's a new grift using the internet overall. I look something up online at the grocery store website, they put a lot of focus on you should order online and pick it up. I go to the store and it's cheaper than the online price for the same store. We're all getting played.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Groceries I haven't checked out because I just go out and buy food when I need food, delivery costs more money than moving my ass for a kilometer, but for other things, in-person stores are still more expensive than online-only. If I want oil, filters, etc for cars, it's twice as much in physical stores compared to online.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think it really depends on what you're getting. For groceries, I generally only buy the half off stuff. Parts are interesting because unless you know exactly what to get, you might end up running in circles. Both vehicles I have are 1998 engines, yet one is a 2000 and one is 2003. It was fun to figure out what serpentine belt I needed.

Another example, manufacturer sells a part for a steam table to regulate the temperature. It was $120 for one part. Alright so I buy one for a customer. Then I did some research. Bought 8 from the UK for the price of one shipped to the US.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It was fun to figure out what serpentine belt I needed.

I've been sold the wrong serpentine belt once or twice from an in-person store, never from an online catalogue though.

I cross-reference the OEM parts catalogue and if necessary, images of the part being replaced to the factory repair manual. 99% of the time, parts by VIN are accurate in the OE catalogue, but occasionally someone has retrofitted some newer or older part in a pinch, in which case the parts store guy is just about useless anyway. E.g my car doesn't have the sump drain plug it should, meaning someone has changed the oil pan for a slightly older one. My engine was in production from 2003 through 2008 in that exact configuration and mine's a 2007, so a few things had already been revised in that time (the engine got a bigger update in 2008, at which point it got a new engine code)

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I had to get the model number off of the old belt to get the correct belt. That's how I learned I have a 1998 engine in a 2003 frame.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh look, they finally found a way to make AI profitable! (It’s just scamming people again)

[–] trashman@feddit.org 20 points 2 days ago

When your prompt doesn't include "no scamming", that's your fault, obviously.

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Google discovering that AI search may quietly steer shoppers toward higher prices is a fun twist: first search results became ads, then ads became recommendations, and now recommendations apparently have a concierge fee. At this rate, AI powered shopping just means your wallet gets the hallucination.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 2 days ago

Discovering?

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

One more reason to get off the net.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They’ve also ruined Google Maps by attempting to “optimize” it with AI

I use a navigation app constantly for work.

A month or two ago Google Maps started doing this thing where it would take me to the incorrect address on the same street as the address I was actually looking for.

Yesterday I put in an address, and it named the destination pin the correct address, but the pin wasn’t even on the same side of the city as the street I knew I was going to.

It used to work flawlessly. What the fuck are they thinking?

Anyway, I deleted that shit. Using Apple Maps until I find a FOSS navigation app I like.

[–] SirLeToet@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The whole internet is slowly getting ruined by AI optimization.

[–] adwijoma@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Because AI was never really meant to be for us. The version for us was just part if the cover.

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DPEWGF@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I recommend switching over to Comaps. Community members raised concerns about transparency & governance with shareholders of Organic Maps. Community members have since left & forked it https://www.comaps.app/about-us/

[–] sys110x@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Im trying to get onboard with CoMaps but its Android Auto implementation needs work. It's too zoomed in to be useful at speed or in traffic, and the directions are wonky with street mergers, highway changes, etc.

I think I can contribute to the directions but not easily while driving. I'm not a coder so I can't write up a zoom setting function for submission.

Any tips for CoMaps in the car?

[–] johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I also rely on navigation ever day. I downloaded the map quest app after Google changed the name of lake ontario and it's been working pretty well for me.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh shit, I didn’t even realize Mapquest was still in the game

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's just yet another client for openstreetmaps, it doesn't have its own maps anymore. There are non-proprietary clients available for OSM tho

[–] ennof@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nor sure if it's FOSS but HERE WeGo is pretty okay.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the recommendation, I’ll look into that one

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

i noticed they already restricting google reviews for locations, to a login popup.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 63 points 2 days ago

i would have thought this was exactly the intention

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

I don’t understand. When you click through to buy something from the retailer, does the price then show as normal? Google Search isn’t a storefront, so I don’t understand how this is actually impacting people’s pocketbooks, outside of anchoring items at a higher price in their mind or something. Either way it’s shitty on Googles part and fuck them, but i don’t understand.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

All AI is to big tech is a way to swindle and control you. Cast them into the sea.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

What are you talking about? There's no way that Google could profit from that.......... /s

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tenbluelinks.org solves that pesky AI problem. Load up the google web search and then use the element picker in uBO to remove the ai links on the search page and presto! Better searches and results.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or just don't use Google. At all.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

This is the way. There are a lot of Google search alternatives now that shows what you are looking for in the 1st or 2nd item, not under all the "recommended", "sponsored" or random promoted posts.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's what I'm doing. They have proven time and time again they aren't to be trusted.

[–] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

I cannot believe Google hasn’t been broken up yet. I haven’t used their services in years and block them on my home network. I used to use their search and other services all the time, until 2022 when I saw several news articles come out about them locking people out of the accounts because their AI accused people of being child abusers, but when those people were found innocent, Google refused to return their data or accounts. That is disgraceful behavior for a company. Plus many many other issues. Glad to see that they are killing their brand with AI, meaning they are not driving traffic to other websites anymore, but raising energy costs for those sites. And that now this. Glad to also see that people are moving away from their map system in the latest round of news. AI needs to be regulated. Our data needs to be protected. Privacy (digital and in the real world) should be a basic human right.

[–] Diamonddoge@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago
[–] Alexfire@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

They didn't expect this one weird trick!

Q: How can people find the lowest $/unit on groceries and not spend so much?

A: https://share.google/aimode/IcNHP23xmFuo69O1O