this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
-7 points (41.5% liked)

politics

31051 readers
1941 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Data centers can be bombed with conventional munitions,” Stokes writes. (He’s not the first thinker to suggest bombings to stop powerful AI; in 2023, AI critic Eliezer Yudkowsky suggested that countries needed to be ready to “destroy a rogue data center by airstrike.”)

Of course, the China hawk isn’t numb to what such an attack would mean for the world.

“Bombing would cross a major threshold that heretofore has not been crossed in US-China relations,” Stokes continues. “Trying to think through the particulars of that will be especially important, in part because it will help policymakers… start to work backwards based on the unique nature of the technology, in the same way that in a past era, policymakers would learn about nuclear weapons.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 2 days ago

Decrepit war hawk says we should attack more countries! Misunderstands what AGI is, more at 6!

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Strike with what? We can't even protect our bases from Iran

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well technically iron dome has been wildly successful in protecting Israel and it has even been expanded upon since the conflict started, but it's kind of an odd statement "How could he stab anything, he has no shield!"

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

More like "How could they win a fight when they can't handle someone smaller who punches back"

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, that's more than a bit disingenuous to imply the USA has exerted it's full military might on Iran, not to mention it doesn't really capture the nuance that Iran's military is basically the same as China's: they supplied the armaments to begin with.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nuance is when you say Iran is China's peer in terms of military power? Sure thing bud

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nobody is saying that, but I definitely did say Iran's military can be considered an arm of China's, and that I mean with full seriousness and genuine belief.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Iran's military is basically the same as China's: they supplied the armaments to begin with.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Here's hoping humiliation will deliver the lessons to the illiterate, as they are unable to understand their own words.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wasn't planning to deliver lessons today but since you insist:

"The Same As" does not mean the same thing as "Equivalent To".

E.G. "Paul is the the same guy as the one in the movie" versus "Paul is practically equivalent to the guy in the movie".

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you want to insist on reframing what you said, while undermining your larger point, go ahead. But i would like to know what exactly it is you were trying to say by making the comparison.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

"We threw a ton of shields at their arrows and it defended us well enough, but we are running out of shields and their cheap arrows are cheap to manufacture at scale......well be fine!"

[–] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know, as a species, we're desperately trying to start World War 3 on a bunch of fronts, but this is one of the stupider ones.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It's propaganda. It's not a serious consideration. It's intention is to make you feel exactly how you felt after reading it.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We making anti-Obama posts now?

People might be more open to this post if they mentioned his current position at CNAS or even his former position as an Analyst in Institute of Peace, clearly an ill fitting role for the slopper, instead of some shit he did over a decade ago. And, a minor nitpick, he was an advisor for VP Biden (under Obama) and Congresswoman Amy Klobuchar, not Obama specifically.

With that out of the way, fuckin sloppers, man. They actually believe this shit or is Microsoft paying him up the wazoo?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Agreed, though that might be the way to actually get people who aren't already opposed to stupid warhawks saying stupid warhawk things to apply some critical thinking to what's being proposed. Because I'd say almost everyone can tell at a glance how stupid this idea is, but a lot of trump supporters wouldn't apply the slightest bit of critical thought to something that came from trumps Institute of Peace.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

We live in a time where faith in the DNC has never been lower and fascism in the USA has never been higher and I don't think thats a coincidence. We shouldn't tolerate smearing the DNC right before a major election.

[–] Pomal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You’re conflating Obama with an opinion from someone who was in his admin and is clout chasing.

Edit: With the current hardware crunch, vaporizing hardware is stupid af. Can we all just gtfo ourselves.