this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
367 points (94.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41730 readers
3427 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Robotunicorn@lemmy.world 4 points 37 minutes ago

That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on! He'll do you up a treat, mate.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Artist/authors John Conway and C. M. Kosemen have a book called All Yesterdays about this subject.

https://designyoutrust.com/2020/09/if-we-drew-modern-animals-the-way-we-draw-dinosaurs-based-on-bones-alone/

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This has always been the one thing that has always bug me with the creation of dinosaurs in book, tv, movies etc. If you look at the skulls of hippos or elephants, they look far different than the actual living animal.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

They don’t just look at the bone structure.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 75 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Scientists are the ones who figured out that dinosaurs had feathers. Whenever science is proven wrong, it’s with more/better science.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 4 points 1 hour ago

Science success story:

Aboriginal religions generally hold that long ago in the Dreaming times, the world was cold, there was less water, and the coast was further away. You used to be able to walk to many of the islands around the Australian coast, because there were land bridges.

White people generally assumed these stories were mythological fiction, because white people are often racist and intolerant. However, science eventually figured out that 10,000 years ago, there was an ice age. The polar ice caps were bigger, and the ocean was shallower. Those land bridges were found under the modern ocean through satellite imaging. Aboriginal religions were right, and science proved that these religious histories had been preserved and kept accurate for 10,000 years!

Science wins again!

[–] Klear@piefed.world 37 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They even know the colouration of a bunch of them, like this Sinosauropteryx:

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

One of the reasons I would love to travel to the future is to see all the ways that people and science are confidently incorrect about depictions of dinosaurs now, and how they're depicted like 300 years in the future. Even within my lifetime, we've gone from slow, fat lizard turds to something realistic like this lil' guy. Amazing stuff.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I share your sentiment but I'd rather go back and see for myself. The future is completely unknown, who knows if you'd land right on the front line in WWIII. At least in the past I have a vague idea of what parts of time to avoid landing in.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 4 hours ago

You could say the same for the past, we don't know when dinosaur World War 2 was, perhaps you'll meet dinosaur Elon Musk and have to talk to him, it's a hell of a risk.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm glad it was so happy when it died. Doing itsy little walk, my cat does that when he has successfully captured the elusive ball of foil.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago

But first somebody had to make a movie with the wrong data, making the whole field cool enough to get funding to found out they were wrong.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 81 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 28 points 6 hours ago

I'm not old enough to see naked bunnies 🫢

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago

Look at those lil ‘staches! That’s the best thing I’ve seen all day

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Is this a certain type of rabbit or is it normal to shave them while leaving a moustache?

[–] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I imagine the shaver meant to leave the whiskers be

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 1 points 17 minutes ago

Same as a cat with skin/fur issues showing up to a vet then yeah.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago

What the animal's skeleton looks like. Or How the animal's skeleton looks.

[–] ThoGot@feddit.org 18 points 7 hours ago

I mean hares basically look like the sketch (plus ears)

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly not that far off. It's like a wet bunny without the ears.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 20 points 8 hours ago

And if the scientists tried hard enough, they could probably figure out the large ears, too -- the skull would have slightly stronger muscle attachment points and vasculature openings to support the larger ears ... although that still wouldn't really tell the scientists what shape the large ears were, though. So you might still get a very odd-looking bunny out of it.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This is something that machine learning may actually be useful for

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 hours ago

I thought the bun is the one who is alert, and you're just notified?

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 6 points 9 hours ago (3 children)
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Just to add context, there is a good book called All Yesterdays about how earlier assumptions of dinosaur appearances based on fossil records have been challenged over time by new evidence. A lot of the artists who have developed visual recreations of dinosaurs in the past were working under assumptions of what dinosaurs were supposed to look like. But skeletons alone aren't always the best reference to use to base appearance off of, because soft tissue (lost to time) can often contain the most iconic aspects of a species.

So just to riff on that idea, the book contains a section called "All Todays" in which artists take modern animal skeletons we are familiar with and recreate them as if they were dinosaurs. So you end up with these gaunt creatures that are missing distinct features like ears, noses, fur/features, and coloration.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 hours ago

I go back to All Tomorrows every now and then. It's weird.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)
[–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

No room for wings? What if they found them elsewhere and placed them thinking this were a flying mammal?