this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31060 readers
2392 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 1 points 32 minutes ago

A lot of people here are vastly overestimating the grade level of material they read. Most newspapers write between a 6th and 8th grade level. NY Times is around 10.

Most politicians also use speeches targeting a 6-8th grade education, for the same reason. Trump speaks somewhere around grade 4.

Laws/bills targeting higher than that, particularly when placed on the ballot, are usually done so to gatekeep the general populace (other people have already posted examples). It's rarely due to technical requirements.

[–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago

From the national literacy institute:

54% of U.S. adults read below the equivalent of a sixth-grade level

Source:

NLI literacy statistics

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 34 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Good.

The more important something is, the clearer it should be. I want a drunken toddler to understand this sht.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I agree. It's not a reading comprehension.

A lot of times, these propositions come off intentionally confusing. Like using double negatives or double speak.

There was a proposition passed by Republicans that was saying to prohibit state officials from prohibiting or limiting religious services. So a YES vote was to vote that they stop it from being banned. And a NO vote was to keep it.

I have to spend an hour or two to vote because of shit like that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

All the more reason why mail-in voting is a beautiful thing, IMHO. You can sit there and read as slowly as you want, with no rush at all.

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

You gotta be really careful with this type of stuff.

Ohio passed a law that allows its current government to "clarify" the way issues are written on the ballot. Conveniently, it was done right before the vote on anti-gerrymandering. This anti-gerrymandering issue intended to select a fair cross-party committee for redrawing districts, but was re-phrased as a wordy and confusing blurb mentioning "unelected individuals" and "without accountability". The issue did not pass. Which was the goal.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

My fucking HOA did this shit and I sued them

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Can someone pass the memo to political columnists?

"Judge strikes down motion denying trump admins attempt to stop the prevention of denying immigrants from striking down denied attempts at prevented..."

Fucking OUT WITH IT. USE YOUR WORDS.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

That's actually one of the more clearly written judicial headlines I've seen. Gotta sprinkle in "overruled", "stayed", "injunction", and "dismissed" to maximize my WTF Meter.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Texas already adopted something like this!

You see, when school districts ~~purpose~~ propose a bond, they are talking about selling bonds in exchange for money. The bond measures ask that you approve them selling x dollars worth of bonds which will be used for very specific purchases, such as computer equipment, roof repairs, and HVAC maintenance. In general bond measures don't raise your taxes because the district already purchased the bonds; this is a request to use what's already been paid for.

On the other hand, districts all across Texas are also trying to pass VATREs, which is a measure asking voters to approve a tax increase to fund the school district. This raises the money that's used to pay salaries, fuel buses, buy teaching supplies, and literally keeps the lights on. Most of the time, if not always, VATREs are a property tax increase. There are considerable exemptions available, including a standard exemption provided by the state that's paid for already by the school districts.

The wording for these proposals are very confusing, including the wording for VATREs, which presents the rate increase as x cents on every dollar per $100. What this really means is that when a district requests a 5¢ increase over, let's say, a 3¢ existing property tax, they're proposing a tax rate increase from 1.03% to 1.08%. These rates typically only affect homeowners whose houses are valued somewhere over $165k, and cost most homeowners a couple dozen dollars per year. But, in return, the school district stays open, teachers stay employed, and schools are less likely to shut down (although Texas is always working on new ways to shut down public schools).

So, VATREs increase taxes, minimally, and are at a flat rate which means that more expensive homes contribute more, thus leveraging high-income earners to help low-income learners. Bond proposals don't increase taxes, and make sure that the learning happens in safe environments. Bond funds CANNOT pay salaries, and VATREs CANNOT repair roofs. But of course, the ballot measures use very confusing language, as all ballot measures tend to. So the state uses very simple language to inform voters. On every school district website, a message must be posted that literally includes these words, verbatim, bolded and in all caps, notifying that the school district

ADOPTED A TAX RATE THAT WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR'S TAX RATE.

And every ballot measure, regardless of tax rate changes, is prefaced with these words

THIS IS A TAX INCREASE

The bonds that are not tax increases? Every single one is prefaced with THIS IS A TAX INCREASE.

Because in Texas, we'll make sure that our education system fails our voters, and then try to ensure that our voters fail themselves. Because it's not enough for school districts to fight hunger and ignorance, we also have to fight the state.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 8 hours ago

What's with the grade scale for reading? Is 1st grade like 7 years old? So 8th grade level is how a 15 years old should be able to read?

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

If voters can't understand materials written at a 12th grade reading level, the education system should be improved to fix the problem rather than dumbing down society to account for it.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

I agree, but often times these are written intentionally confusing. The info should be presented in a manor that the entire population can understand it clearly.

Make the existing situation more digestible while improving the education system. Unfortunately, there are many adults that are no longer in the education system that won't directly benefit from better education standards, so we need to accommodate them as well.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 7 hours ago

I think we're sadly in a position to need both, until the educational system is corrected.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

This seems like a good thing.

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Wouldn't help, the median reading and comprehension range of Americans is 5th grade