I haven't dug into the code, but blanket hate for AI in code is extremely frustrating. There's a difference between vibe coding and the hundred other ways to "use AI" on a project.
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
71 points (86.6% liked)
Technology
87938 readers
2955 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It's funny because anyone seeing this as black and white clearly hasn't ever opened an IDE.
Usually, if it's noticeable that AI was used on code, the code is flawed or, at least, has copyright concerns.
Noooo All AI is Baaad!!1!
/s
It's tiresome.
Look at the comments here. Do you think the haters here care?
@bekkaboo@girlcock.club Linux itself is heavily using AI models.
For security analysis and uncovering bugs.
I don't like GOS devs, they are not focused on usablity, but on security (which is completely valid, but it's a shame that GOS is the most usable mobile OS), but holy based.
If you are disputing AI utility in coding: Recent Linux kernel versions fixed up to 3 times more CVEs in comparision to releases before AI. Also, much less of those CVEs are found in the newer versions, which means new kernel releases contain better code.
view more: next ›