this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
1020 points (99.6% liked)

196

6824 readers
2522 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

David Simon, creator of 'The Wire', being interviewed by Ari Shapiro (NPR)

SHAPIRO: Ok, so you've spent your career television without AI, and I could imagine today you thinking, boy, I wish I had that tool to solve those thorny problems...

SIMON: What?

SHAPIRO: ... Or saying...

SIMON: You imagine that?

SHAPIRO: ... Boy, if that had existed, it would have screwed me over.

SIMON: I don't think AI can challenge what writers do at a fundamentally creative level.

SHAPIRO: But if you're trying to transition from scene five to scene six, and you're stuck with that transition, you could imagine plugging that portion of the script into an AI and say, give me 10 ideas for how to transition this.

SIMON: I'd rather put a gun in my mouth.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This should have been a link

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 64 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I feel this way about writing code

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 37 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

What makes me sad is how it’s an IQ test. If using AI makes you feel like you’re becoming a better coder, what do you think is cheaper for Anthropic or OpenAI, to make you feel something or to actually do something? Same business model as Fox News: don’t actually inform people, just make them feel informed. Much cheaper and sells like hotcakes.

[–] Doug@piefed.social 20 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I remember hearing once that when your brain knows there is an option to depend on an external source for something it could’ve stored in its memory, it loses (or at least weakens) the opportunity to utilize the elasticity that would’ve made the effort into storing that information, and this problem compounds the more often one uses the external source.

I think about that whenever I turn to a search engine to look something up. I can’t imagine how much more I’d think about that using an AI to think for me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 9 points 18 hours ago

If AI does anything better than you, you aren't very good at it and using AI won't help you get better. Learn and practice instead until you can get the results you want. If people abandon working on themselves we'll have nothing left but a bunch of talentless losers and ai slop.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 206 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I was told by a 17 year old that there is no way people are writing 10-page papers without A.I.

I told him I was writing 10-page papers without even reading the book.

[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Credit? You just gonna steal that quote without crediting the source? That's just what AI does.

[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 12 points 14 hours ago

It's what people who write 10 page papers without reading the book do too

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 35 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

I went to college rather late in life and was 36 when I started. Kids were stressing over the AI detecting programs. I suggested just writing their own papers. They looked at me like I'd said I came from Mars.

[–] Spot@startrek.website 34 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I'm in my late 40's and going back to school via online courses. I about pulled what's left of my hair out going round and round with a professor that kept marking me off, with a note stating "You should not use chat or AI programs to do your work". The work that I wrote.
Had not even thought to use any; Im old and set in my ways already, have enough going on making sure I am using the right class programs needed and, this was a required side course, not really anything difficult to me yet (could have skipped it if my previous schooling hadn't been sooo far previous).

Took over a dozen emails back and forth with me begging her to tell me how she surmised my writing was done by anything other than myself. Offering to have a 1:1 video session where she could watch me write, offering to record myself and send it alongside my work, anything.
She finally responded that she goes online and has AI tell her if a submitted document was written by AI. Never would say which site(s) so that I could do my own pre-checking, nothing on our library site or course links and documents that referred one to use either.

So. That is how I started using AI and let various chat programs complete the remainder of that course for me. Since, for some unholy reason, the assignments done that way were no longer flagged for AI use.
This is also how I learned I despise this technology and that cunt who can go fuck off with her own AI loving, short cut using, bitch ass.

[–] temptationscattreats@lemmy.zip 19 points 17 hours ago

The more things change, the more things stay the same. In my college days, I had a professor who insisted that Wikipedia cannot be trusted and he would threaten us with 0 on a paper if he suspected we even peeked at the site's pages on whatever subjects we we writing about.

A buddy of mine hit bingo. By pure coincidence he used the exact same reference as a Wikipedia page, down to the page number and the professor gave him a 0 for the report.

Thing is, if we aren't allowed to even look at Wikipedia, then we would have no way of knowing if we used an identical reference.

My buddy dropped the course, and the rest of us who stuck it out ended up wishing we had done the same. Terrible professor tainted otherwise interesting subject matter.

I know you can't always avoid bad professors, but if you realize it early on and you have the opportunity to drop the course, do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] frog@feddit.uk 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am part of a book club and a friend of mine joked, "I'll join but I need the CliffNotes."

I go, "Does CliffNotes even still exists?" I really didn't know.

It does exist and they have free summaries.

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

For a brief second, I thought there was new Thug Notes.

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago
[–] frog@feddit.uk 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

How have I never heard of this?!

This will give me days of entertainment. Life changing really.

Thank you.

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 7 points 16 hours ago

You're welcome my well read baller!

[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately there are a lot of people my age who have or would do that, but they're missing out on getting drunk while writing and then waking up the next day to see if what you wrote is okay to turn in. (Yes, I genuinely did this when I was in college and would do it again. At least I didn't cheat like my peers did.)

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Write drunk, edit sober.

~ Ernest Hemingway

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Ah the creative freedom of literature analysis

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

You need some kind of certificate...permission...license...THAT'S it, Poetic License.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 87 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

As @Akido37@lemmy.world pointed out in their comment, this was from an NPR interview on the 2023 writers guild strike.

Also of note, this portion of Adam Conover's talk with Cory Doctorow recently included a bit of inside baseball on how the writers guild strategized and talked about AI with their members:

This is what I would say to people on the picket line. Again, there are plenty of people in the writer guild who said, "Chatbot is going to be able to do my job. It's going to be able to write a screenplay." And part of our job in leadership was to shake them and say "no, the chatbot can NOT do your job." The starting point of your negotiation has to be "I am valuable. I have value that the computer does not have." You need to recognize that in yourself first. Otherwise you're giving the power to the computer before you've begun. You don't start from a position of powerlessness. You start from a position of the world is made of people. People need other people. I do things that the boss's computer cannot do. The boss needs me. How do I use my power in order to, you know, protect my position?

[–] Elting@piefed.social 85 points 1 day ago (6 children)

NPR has increasingly more chickenshit journalists at their employ. A shame because even now radio is powerful media that can change and influence minds, they just use more of their airtime to shill for AI instead of doing real journalism

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ari Shapiro isn’t chickenshit. It’s a fair question in the context of the interview, and the response to the question is awesome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

They gotta shill for AI because the goal is total mass surveillance on the general public with total privacy for the rich kiddie fuckers.

Oh and also ginning up fake "evidence" to pin on dissidents.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh come on.

NPR’s goal is not mass surveillance. Their goal is to stay employed.

Which is really only possible by playing the role of court jester for the folks whose goal is mass surveillance.

So you see, it’s totally different. Except for the ways in which it produces an indistinguishable outcome.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

The rich don't necessarily get privacy all the time. But they get impunity for what people do see.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

These dudes have these uncreative jobs where an AI literally can push your stupid spreadsheets or whatever all day. They can't imagine being creative, enjoying the process, the feeling of it all flowing. They can't imagine that. They see a script and to them its just more text on a piece of paper not a work of art.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Similarly CEOs don’t understand that making a report or writing an analysis that looks reasonable at first glance but is inaccurate is super simple for a human to do too. Fixing all the errors and made up stuff takes longer than just doing the work carefully. My boss was proud they used AI to do a works cited for something and left google.com/ in the linked references. If I was a reviewer for a funding organization seeing that would not be a vote of confidence that the applicant was serious.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 23 points 22 hours ago

But look at all the words. There's so many words. And sentences! it's got sentences!

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

this should get crossposted to !fuck_ai@lemmy.world

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could you imagine the derivitive piece of trash The Wire would be if genuine masters of their craft like David Simon, Ed Burns, George Pelacanos et al resorted to ChatGPT every time they got a little stuck?

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Senator Clay Davis would probably just say "shit" like a normal person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Akido37@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago
[–] pumpupthejam@piefed.social 12 points 22 hours ago

A man got to have a code.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›