ummm, the only times I ever used deepseek was fully offline on my hardware, I call bullshit
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
89 points (83.0% liked)
Technology
87980 readers
2466 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
You almost certainly weren't using a Deepseek model offline (unless you have 100s of GB of RAM/VRAM). You might have been using a small model distilled on Deepseek responses, but the smallest model made by Deepseek is about a 300B param model.
the smallest model made by Deepseek is about a 300B param model.
This is not correct. DeepSeek has plenty of smaller models. I just had a scroll through their huggingface, and picked out a few: DeepSeek-V2-Lite (16B), deepseek-moe-16b-chat, deepseek-llm-7b-chat, but there's quite a few more too.
Though DeepSeek R1 is their flagship model, which is the one people usually think of, and that's a 684B param model.
is anthropic.com a reliable source for an information that benefits anthropic's image?
Proof: trust me bro.
Proof: Claude told me.
I don't believe a word they say.
They are lying for their stupid IPO
I love open Chinese llms but this seems 100% plausible and and I think ur wring. This is in line with how Chinese companies need to work around the system since America tries to handicap them. This is actually a very smart way to get high quality trianjng data for their future models. Unfortunate about leaking private customer data to a us company though.
Also the article and the evidence presented by Antropic all seems very plausible.
The onion is nothing compared to real headlines
What this really boils down to is that Anthropic and OpenAI hope to be the only ones that use someone else's copyrighted information without any legal or financial complications.
Alright, so what? Also this (even if it's true and not another clown show by claude) won't affect models that aren't hosted by moonshot or deepseek.
Yeah that's pretty crazy but this bit is crazier - https://www.anthropic.com/threat-intelligence-report-september-2026#cyber-operations-sep-26