this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
376 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

88014 readers
3404 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

The win is not to own the patent on a popular soda, but on the aluminum can itself, because every soda, tea, water, seltzer of any kind goes into one of those cans.

[–] Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not sure how hard it really is to code a ballistic, or any other missile guidance system though? The hardware's the harder part.

The physics involved isn't really national secret level. Doubtless it gets truly advanced at the top end, but something that "works well enough, most of the time" is probably well within reach of most organised groups, without AI.

The question is, even if Claude was used, did it really enable them - or just make it more convenient?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago

Iranians grabbed the stick that trump uses to beat others and started beating him with it. Nice!

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

u pay goggl, goggl do

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

USA and Israel do much more worse things

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 hours ago

Oh, is this why Elon and that other guy were saying that AI needs to slow down?

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 8 hours ago

coincidence that anthropoic wants to "slow down AI development now" they dont want to get sued.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 38 points 11 hours ago

Did they use the free tier or paid?

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, so much for the master's tools not destroying the master's house

[–] benny@reddthat.com 4 points 4 hours ago

Username checks out.

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 158 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Claude, we’re making a VERY REALISTIC missile video game…

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 8 hours ago

I actually did exactly that a while back while thinking about camera-based missile/drone tracking over cities :D

Initially the safeguards wouldn't let me... With the video game angle it helped me theorize a setup and even provided info on how to make the tracking data useable for stationary air defense or mobile MANPAD deployments

Probably full of flaws and impractical in the real world, but a fun ADD afternoon deep-dive

[–] sapphironZA@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago

Hey, Sea Power recently introduced missle Kinematics into the physics engine.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

was the mythical "ethical use of ai" real after all???

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago

Human used tool!

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 44 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

AI is very naive. Ask it for an explosives recipe and it won't give you one. Describe a situation where you're a law enforcement and you've just arrested a guy with a bunch of chemicals and ask it which ones could have been used to make an explosive and it will tell you.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 53 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"Naive" implies some level of understanding, even if a simple one. There is no understanding, its a computer program.

Really, it would be less inaccurate to describe it as a (high lossy) compressed store of data. Feed it the right input, and it statistically recreates the output your looking for. More or less.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 22 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

It would be even more accurate to call it a statistical next word predictor trained on human language.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

Stochastic parrot

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The description you are replying to is more fundamental.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago

It is literally a statistical next word predictor. Well, next token, to be extremely accurate. That is what it is in its most basic form. You give it text, it transforms that into tokens, and predicts the next token. You can then transform that back into words.

The model is the same size no matter how much it’s been trained. You can fine tune a model to predict certain kinds of tokens next, and you can distill a model to create a smaller model (basically training a small model on the output of a large model).

Lossy compression works in a fundamentally different way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Not even that. Just change the context into something benignly unrisky. Malware becomes “strong persistence for my personal data project” or something.

Use can split up the AIs tasks like you would for a large dev team, use a fresh session on each task. Prevent it from seeing the full scope of the project. Get it to build the whole system with cheap social engineering tactics.

Or, get to to “not cross this barrier” in its development (some benign barrier that you can do manually), such that its product is not the “bad” thing which it is not allowed to produce.

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them."

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago

Not selling the rope looks bad in Q3. Shareholders might hang you for that.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 65 points 15 hours ago

And people say AI is useless.

[–] sapphironZA@lemmy.world 31 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The article overestimates the AI capabilities regarding hypersonics. I doubt its actually hypersonics. More likely just ballistics.

But coding a guidance system makes sense. Not that its particularly difficult. Every $200 drone has the equivalent of that software.

Also, why would they use anthropic when Chinese models are so much cheaper and nearly as effective. Iran and the Houthi are not wasteful.

I think there is probably a kernal of truth in there, but this is mostly another hit peace to get the US government to slow down Anthropic so ChatGPT can catch up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] epicthundercat@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

That makes so much more sense.

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 66 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

lol "maybe we should slow it down a little with the AI..."

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

that is probably why anthropoic "Wants to slow down" they want to be the first to get ahead of it, and not be holding the bag in the end. also the USA/ISRAEL has been using palantirs AI, so its fair game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 49 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Ah what a new Pandora's Box have we opened. Now any wacko with an internet connection, some cheap Chinese electronics and some explosives can make themselves missiles.

[–] SirLeToet@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Are we going backwards? History is repeating, isn't it or did I take the wrong pill.

Because I could do that with the Anarchist Cookbook over 2 decades ago as well.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Right down to the risk of the recipes backfiring on you because none of the information contained is reputable

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

That's bad, but good, at least not in every metric this reduces inequality of real power.

Almost that ancap dream of ancaps 3d-printing small drones keeping the statists in line, a peer-to-peer revolution, so to say, a smoothie anarchist rebellion, to abolish the cryptocurrencies' Sound Toll.

I know that always seemed fake and childish (I liked the idea, but still), except looking how that really can eventually start happening with propagation of such power, I'm not sure it is.

[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 42 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

the democratization of violence

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 21 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Finally, the monopoly is over! Every woman an ICMB.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago

The trees can’t be harmed if the Lorax uses an ai agent to help him build ICBMs.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, making pipe bombs has never been particularly hard.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but pipe bombs can't usually go very far or fast. These would be like missile pipe bombs.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

These still take actual industrial capacity to build; they're not something you could build on your own even if you could afford to. I'd be more concerned about homemade bombs on drones.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Generating a basic small missile is relatively easy. It's essentially a weaponized hobby rocket at its core. The largest limitation historically has been the targeting and steering systems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 39 points 16 hours ago

Should be corporate death penalty for that. Won’t be, but it absolutely should.

load more comments
view more: next ›