this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
1192 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

12171 readers
3596 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Surgeons and engineers make bank last I checked, so that's a bit of a funny example. Markets do reward in-demand practical skills.

What societies (in general) really reward is dumb luck and networking, though.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ehm mister or not,

What engineers does society in 2026 reward? Last time I checked everyone is fucked

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The people at FAANGS (or whatever they're calling it now) famously start with wages that would be the absolute peak of someone else's career. Never mind comparing to an unskilled worker.

I know less about what physical/"real" engineers make in 2026, but I doubt it's changed that much.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Real engineer here, mechanical working to design medical devices like plates and screws for trauma cases.

We average around $100k across the US, and on the extreme end can top out around $200k, but that's a rare case. Typical top end is $150k with I'd say at least 12 years if experience.

Starting salary typically $70k.

This is for places that are average COL, so not San Francisco, and also not Alabama.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's decent. Not fuck-you money, but decent.

OP asked for any example, so I went with FAANGS, but wages there are inflated by being a bunch of monopolies all headquartered in the same place. Last I heard a senior dev in Canada makes like 60k.

[–] JaceTheGamerDesigner@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A senior dev in Canada also makes 6 figures.

But some recruiters label beginner positions as senior for whatever reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (36 children)

Is there any system that reward talent, hard work or skill ?

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 29 points 2 days ago

In theory yes but in practice greedy leeches have found their way

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you try to do that you need metrics for evaluation and then you get people gaming the metrics. One example is academia.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You would think, but actually there's been some recent research that I think has interesting conclusions. The example, which is semi-related, is performance as a manager. When promoted using merit based, people tended to perform worse bcz they are promoted based on past performance in unrelated roles. When promoted randomly, the people who excelled at being a manager stayed in that position, and outperformed others who were promoted based on merit.

The point being, you don't know who's going to be good at something based on past performance in unrelated roles. We've built an entire system based on that concept, and it's not really that surprising that it doesn't work that well. If I can find the research article again, I'll link it.

Edit: found it

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The point being, you don't know who's going to be good at something based on past performance in unrelated roles.

What's surprising to me isn't that the random promotion system works over the performance in past unrelated roles system...

What's surprising to me is that you practically never see the only other logical conclusion used in the business world much.

Aptitude testing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

Market socialism maybe. Look up mutualism and anarcho-syndicalism.

But personally I don't think we need to do that. It's to each according to need, not to each according to ability. We shouldn't give people less because they're disabled or more because they're abled.

^ this.

Once we can meet everyone's needs, then we can start talking about how to allocate the surplus. But I trust a society that takes cade of its people more than I trust us, in our current state, to have the right ideas about how that should work.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sports, kinda. It's possible to go unrewarded with them, but it's very hard to go rewarded without them.

If you mean economic system, not really. Capitalism rewards having capital over everything else, communism (if we ignore the flawed attempts and go for theory) rewards everyone equally irrelevant of how hard you work or what your skills are. Though being skilled in something that's actually pleasant as a job is a reward in itself as you won't have to work manual labour.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

No, because it would be up to people to assess talent/hard work/skill and people are imperfect.

Also would you even want that system? Reward a bunch of John Henrys for killing themselves when their work should be done by machines? Reward artists for art that no one can appreciate? Reward skill that doesn't ultimately benefit anyone?

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This implies neurosurgeons aren’t talented

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Well, it's not rocket science...

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Spoken like a true butthurt neurosurgeon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

in before some child comes, downvotes people and bullshits about how Elon is actually very clever

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uen3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago
[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm all of those and I'm super rich

[–] mEEGal@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

an yet, you're on lemmy with the rest of us...

fake and possibly gay

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey, we all love you if you're gay. Fake, however, that's unforgivable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›