this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
664 points (86.7% liked)

Technology

88252 readers
5674 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The platform says hackers targeted a firm that helped to verify the ages of its users.

From 2025.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago (6 children)

We told you this would happen. We told you this would be the result of "age verification". As usual, you fucking didn't listen.

I hope Discord is sued into receivership over this.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Something tells me they will not face any consequences.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

that's just a feeling, right? there's no prior experience that could trigger that, right? *nudge, nudge. wink, wink.*

Anyway, miraculously i haven't been hit with the age-wall yet, bur when i do, Discord will lose a user.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it's a shame this didn't come 1-2 years earlier before discord got its claws in more stuff. Discord really caught on in my corners of the internet in the last 2 years. Before that, it was just my Minecraft pals. Even creators who freed themselves from the advertising machine by going fan-funded on Patron style sites still use discord to communicate. I hate to see them hit by boycott action against Discord, but if you stand on an archery range, don't be surprised when you have a bunch of arrows sticking out of your noggin. ¯\(ツ)/¯

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Tiral@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Or ever will.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 229 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is old news. It didn't happen a second time.

[–] Sebeck012@feddit.nl 13 points 3 days ago

Yeah, they've changed. This time they'll keep the data safe, for realsies, pinky promise. Im sure they even gave their employees a stern talking to!

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago (6 children)

First ive heard of it.

Also not trying to be rude but is this Technology or Technology news? Like I keep seeing people post things but if there not like the newest tech, they get downvoted. Im not saying thats incorrect but Id like to know in case I post what the distinction is.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 77 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Tech news and articles".

Since this is purely a news article, it's of little value a year later, when a more up-to-date article about verification would have more current information.

If it was about how some part of the tech stack worked ("article") and things hadn't changed that much, an older article would probably fare better.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah gotcha! Thanks. I dont know why I didnt make that connection then.

[–] tauonite@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You should put the year clearly in the title of the post

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Either way it's important to convey that this article is old and it didn't happen a second time.

This makes it sound current.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

News are new.
So yes, that response is expectable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 7 points 3 days ago

At some point tech turned into a catch all for big app companies, instead of gadgets and the like...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 days ago

Discord announced that it's going to start estimating user ages and using a third-party group to do so, so there is some relevance to it.

[–] cotlovan@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I thought that they were deleting the photos immediately after verification. They didn't??? Why aren't these companies being investigated and punished?

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

Because money. We'll soon have to take things into our own hands, as the establishment only protects itself, and not us plebs.

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.pub 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is from the leak last year. What leaked was pictures uploaded to their ticket system to appeal the result of a failed verification.

[–] III@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

...so you are saying their verification process is so broken that hundreds of thousands of people had to appeal a false reading. Broken and insecure, what a look.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

Why? For example, XING just got sold and with it all personal information. This is why they didn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm glad you added from 2025 there because otherwise it would have been super deceptive.

I definitely thought it happened again, and I was gonna be like, well that was fast. Like we all know it's going to happen again, but that would have been extremely fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who could've seen that coming?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago

Certainly not anyone who objected to the practice.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This article is dated "9 October 2025" which would make it almost a year old.

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, dates in submission links would be great. Wonder if it can be automated so when I submit a URL, lemmy fetches the creation date while it's fetching the headline.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 days ago

This article is a year old, but relevant because Discord started doing the verifications again. The plan was never canceled, just delayed to a later news cycle. And this will absolutely happen again because there are no consequences.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I hope I never gave them that. I had Nitro for a bit, but I don't think I would have ever willingly gave them that.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Wao, again? The reasons why people keep using these bullshit services really make my mind spin. This is no different than people choosing to stay in a relationship with an abusing partner.

Edit: I just saw this is from last year's leak. Still, the likeness remains.

[–] Stolas@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

The comparison answers your question actually.

Comfort. There's a certain amount of comfort when you're within an abusive relationship. Yes, it's awful, yes you're being hurt over and over again, but you're familiar with it. You know what to expect, where as taking the leap and leaving for the unknown can be scary.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is no different than people choosing to stay in a relationship with an abusing partner.

I say that about Windows users who jump through hoops to try to disable the spying and they get mad at me, LOL.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago

As far as discord is concerned, I’m a proud citizen of Albania now. Much like Eric Adams.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So so so so so misleading to post this when this will be interpreted as an event from 2026. Post should be removed IMO.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago (4 children)

There's a 2025 in the title

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Wow, and now they want to relay your info through 2 or 3 parties for verications.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 14 points 3 days ago
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

May? May? Just say that IDs where leaked. We all know nowdays that for sure are leaked.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago
[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 12 points 3 days ago

Storing raw photos feels like storing plaintext passwords. Hackers have access to your password and your photo now.

[–] Nuerion@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

really posting something from last year when the age thing is coming out

load more comments
view more: next ›