this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
691 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

88329 readers
3913 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AntonioAndolini@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

There is a surprisingly good amount of free games and movies, it would actually save me time if they were to "ban vpns"

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like they want people board and mad, a historically winning combination.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Hungry soon too

Aggressively stupid bullshit, fuck these clowns.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago

Sounds like another assault on freedom of speech.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 days ago

Ban the RIAA and MPAA.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

political theater. won't happen because it's unenforceable.

  • VPNs operate outside of federal control
  • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor which is laughable
  • DNS exists outside of the US

if this does happen, IF, it has nothing to do with IP rights or protecting Americans. it has everything to do with censoring what the majority of common Americans read online. this is the first step towards blocking news outlets that won't regurgitate whitehouse directives.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm a bit surprised they've gone with piracy as an excuse - usually it's "Think of the children!" Maybe they've finally figured out that we already know that republicans are thinking of (molesting) the children so they've fallen back on "You wouldn't download a car".

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)
  • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor

And blocking the IP address of the site in question, as well. That’s why so many “illegal” sites jump around IP addresses like a flea on a hot griddle. They’re trying to remain accessible whenever the ISP prevents direct access.

Because if you block the IP address, blocking DNS is superfluous and performative -- it’s just window dressing for better optics towards politicians who don’t understand tech. DNS censorship trivially bypassible by using custom DNS servers that aren’t affected by the censorship, while IP blocking hits everyone who is under that ISP regardless of their DNS settings - they need a VPN to bypass IP blocking.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

My ISP wondering why I only ever access 5 servers in Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and Finland

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 368 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

This leads to the government deciding which websites you can visit and cant visit down the line. This is a dystopian level of control and with surveillance already getting dystopian… Pick your dystopian technology book and decide which one we’re leading towards. Fascism policies are already on the rise in democratic worlds.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And wouldn't you know it, anything that disagrees with the current regime is piracy.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not just piracy. Woke piracy.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Woke piracy is the best piracy!!

[–] Noam_Calhoun@lemmy.today 157 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Great, more boomers who can't understand how the internet works.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 141 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This doesn't stem from a lack of understanding. It's about corporations and control.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 58 points 3 days ago (7 children)

We need to stop believing the boomer’s framing that they’re all old and dumb, and start realizing that they’d eat us if we tasted good

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's the whole point of VPN providers. They're not in your jurisdiction.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But surely the whole point of using the VPN is to use one that's outside of U.S authority?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not if you want low lacency.

IMO your main concern should be about what country the VPN is based out of (and their privacy policy) more than where the servers are located. But then again I suppose it all depends on what kind of activity you're using your VPN for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 days ago (4 children)

US on the way to become a less free country than China lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 48 points 2 days ago

This goes far deeper than just "piracy". Everyone's favourite section 1201 of the DMCA also means that this bill will result in the US blocking foreign sites which explain to you how to fix your shit if you have to bypass even the most inane digital lock.

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Like this will ever work. lol. Just don’t get VPN from a company that is headquartered in the US. Problem solved. There are a million other ways to bypass this. There will ALWAYS be away, they’re just trying to make it harder for the experienced, and impossible for your average Joe.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

This is the same party that are all for unregulated AI use and no consequences for breaking copyright to train it.

This bill's goal is to provide a standardized mechanism to filter sites then start blocking sites that state doesn't approve.

It's same as the other "think of the children" bills of the party that is protecting pedophiles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dmtalon@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Choose your DNS provider wisely

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 72 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (13 children)

And ensure your VPN provider isn’t headquartered in the US (or better yet any five eyes nation) nor one of the ones owned by the Israeli Billionaire Teddy Sagi who likely also has deep ties to the Israeli and US governments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kape_Technologies

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 3 days ago

TIL expressVPN started as

Crossrider started off by making a SDK for the deployment of browser extensions platforms with support for monetizing extensions. The monetization options were used by major [ad injectors which used man-in-the-browser to change or add advertisements to what users saw.

JFC.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 42 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Yeah, good luck with enforcing that to foreign VPN providers, you dumb fucks.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 35 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Next step is blocking access to foreign VPN providers. They are dumb fucks, but they are persistent dumb fucks.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We're just not allowed to use computers in any way that actually benefits us, anymore? Digital prison man.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 49 points 3 days ago (7 children)

If piracy was a problem I can find them multiple international corporations that are well know for using copyrighted content to train their LLM without paying for it or having permission from the owner of that content.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly, this is to implement mechanism to block political sites that the state doesn't approve. Please contact your representatives.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SecretiveVault@lemmy.zip 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The Corrupt Empire of America at it again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ErevanDB@lemmy.zip 42 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Well, time to protest, and if need be, use the constitution how it was intended.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 12 points 2 days ago

I think i2p may see a big uptick in usage then.

[–] alchemist2023@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

host your own recursive DNS like technitium or unbound then you remain in control they can't deny root DNS

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

DNS only handles the initial domain-to-IP translation.

What the article is (mostly) talking about is the second step - blocking access to the destination IP/site entirely.

load more comments
view more: next ›