this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
106 points (95.7% liked)

politics

31307 readers
2264 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeah....good luck with that Ladyballer.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I always confuse Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk

Hopefully someone else does too

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago

I always confuse Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk

They're easy to tell apart: one is still alive and wears a yarmulke. The other is dead and was antisemite.

One of them got shot in the neck for being an asshole.

I don't know anything else about either of them.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I guess someone should make a charlie kirk movie and take a swing at him and Ayn Rand by calling it the Fountainhead.

Naturally MAGA will clutch their pearls so hard their hands bleed and then in the exact same moment tell you to get over it snowflake (this movie) because it's a free country.

[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

everyday my hatred calcifies for MAGA, they are unworthy of redemption

That's brilliant. Take my money.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 20 points 5 days ago

Of course it’s offensive, because if it weren’t, nobody would talk about it at all

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ben Shapiro doesn't just talk shit, he films it too.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ben Shapiro eats pieces of shit for breakfast.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago
[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 9 points 4 days ago

It’s being talked about…. So, mission accomplished. The best ring to do with these ghouls is to ignore them.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's offensive specifically because that'll give it free advertising by outlets like this.

[–] Buhbyelittlegumshoe@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s a free market. People can just not buy the product.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

An analogy to my point is Trump's election in 2016; he was elected as the Republican nominee specifically because of so many media outlets constantly reporting on all of the outrageous things he said at the expense of less extreme candidates.

[–] Cherries@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The major reason Trump was made the GOP candidate was the Pied Piper strategy employed by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. They intentionally raised up Trump because they thought he would be an easy opponent to defeat.

[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

If you think conservatives don't have agency because you don't actually consider other humans as people, I can see why you'd choose to blame a Democrat for Republican actions.

[–] Buhbyelittlegumshoe@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Nothing about the HRC having negative juice and being a total neoliberal ghoul

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What is it with the blue hair with the cons?

Also, I still laugh that cons constantly talk about masculinity and manhood and testosterone and so on, and then....follow Ben Shapiro?

That guy comes off like such a little dweeb. He sounds like Squidward, and then there was that time this genius went to Home Depot...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lko-K3xOZGI

[–] BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

They are scared by people that are different, and even more so of people that don't conform to their idea of what people should do and look like.

Blue hair is different. It's that simple. It starts with blue hair, and next thing you know they'll be advocating non-violence, caring for the poor, or.. horror of horrors, they may not be strictly heterosexual!

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago

No bottom for these people

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The first shot takes the [sic] Melanie in the neck, below her covid mask. The second in the head, above her covid mask.

They are trying to send some lame underlying message that masks don't protect you at all.

[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

The ones the majority of people were using didn't. They protected other people from you, so obviously conservatives don't care about that at all.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I hope her family sues him too