this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
469 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

88559 readers
3267 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So I saw a few relevant newspieces:

~ Companies are now ceasing their mandate to workers to use AI to do things that used to be done without AI. They're now saying don't use AI just to use AI. They're trying to reduce their token purchases.

~ The estimation now for AI use cases is to reconsider if tokens cost ten times their current price. If the use case is still worth it, then that use case will likely survive the bubble. If it's not worth it, it's time to hire back employees.

~ The hyperscale AI industry will have to make $6 trillion annually to break even. Amazon makes $2 trillion by selling people material stuff. Walmart is similar. There may not be a market for $6 trillion in tokens every year, even from government projects. Also, it's a bad sign if government projects are propping up the whole stock market.

~ China is mostly turning to a software AI model which does home and small business AI tasks fairly well without buying compute from a hyperscaler. You get a gaming machine, get open source AI software and a dozen terabytes of training data, and you should be able to create slop, vibe code or fix the grammar and style of your report. Also, hyperscale models are opinionated and don't like certain topics. Home-grown AI doesn't have those objections.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 9 points 16 hours ago

Also, hyperscale models are opinionated and don't like certain topics. Home-grown AI doesn't have those objections.

Unless you create or review the training data and train your model yourself, home grown AI models do have those objections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 177 points 1 day ago (23 children)

I had a boomer normie ask me how to use AI to develop his new "business" website telling me that he didn't want to hire a developer if the developer would just use AI anyway.

This guy doesn't know what a router is, and was asking me for help trying to understand what the AI was telling him, and it was the most basic shit.

When the normies are trying to invest in AI, they're the last to invest and know to throw money at it. That was a big signal to me that the bubble is about to pop. Money is running out and the boomers are trying to get in on it.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Exactly this. If you hear people talking about investments around the Thanksgiving table, its time to bail. All the smart people got in months ago and have left, they are just looking for bag holders now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago

Why would someone ask a person to explain an AI response they didn’t understand? Like, you’ve already offloaded the most important part from a human brain (getting a fucking answer)… Why wouldn’t you at least then ASK THE AI TO REPHRASE AND SUMMARIZE the response you didn’t understand? That’s the thing it’s actually good at doing ffs.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I own a beer bar, and we work with some friends who have a catering business that does pop ups on our patio. They've been using AI to generate flyers and then tag us to have us share them to our larger audience. I stopped doing it because they look like trash, get low engagement, and are off brand for our art-inspired space. They got upset with me that we weren't helping promote, and I explained my position on their AI flyers, and they sent a very lengthy email back about how AI is being utilized by small businesses in ways that we're still scratching the surface to understand its value. I popped the email into chatgpt and asked if it wrote that email and it said it did, lol. Now I have more work on my hands to design their flyers for them, but it's worth it.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 9 points 13 hours ago

I recently read a decent article (in Danish mind you), focused on the positions some volunteers had from getting more fans to their local football club... Because they now posted stuff on Facebook.

Then followed up by an expert on engagement, and statistics on about half the population felt AI image generations to be off putting - And a fair chunk of the remainder not really caring, and a small minority finding it cool/useful.

That experts main position, was the human touch was lost and the volunteer of the local football club would most likely get more people to stadium if they asked a bunch of 2nd graders to draw match day posts.

Because it would genuinely connect to people. So yeah, a lot of smaller businesses and volunteers are currently having a feeling all of this AI gen is giving them more traffic and attention, but in reality they're getting more attention because they went from doing nothing to doing something

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 5 points 12 hours ago

The amount of food menus with it on is ridiculous. If you sell food you want it to look good, appetizing etc, so making it look like plastic tat is counter effective.

Second I immediately think they either don't care or are uninterested in their product. That makes me question how much they care about their food, safety quality taste etc. It's an immediate no for me.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

I popped the email into chatgpt and asked if it wrote that email and it said it did, lol

It doesn't work that way tho

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] octobob@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Isn't a beer bar just a bar?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago

Nah, it's a poncy pub.

A bar retains the ponce but lacks beer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it's so bizarre to me that people who work with food don't realize that the ai trash is producing images that are REVOLTING, do not look like food, and actively deter people from their products.

you'd be better off with a half lit shitty polaroid of actual food than putting that trash on your branding, so much of it is nightmare fuel

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I used to work in a wine store. Customers would always joke “hahaha i just pick them by the label 😂” and I would always say. That’s not stupid, wine is about aesthetics. Someone who makes good wine will appreciate the value of a good label. And the inverse is true, people with poor taste won’t care about their label, but they won’t be able to make good wine, either.

I’m saying judge a book by its cover. How else are you gonna know what’s in the book without looking at its cover??

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

You're definitely right, the food looks so phony. The thing that's wild is half the time they make a flyer, there's only bricks of yellow text on a black background that's too much info to read. I'm visiting San Francisco right now and saw a pizza shop last night that their entire menu was AI garbage and was so shocked how prevalent it's become.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

A usual ramen spot I've been going to for the past few years for some reason replaced the old images of the food on their menu with AI-gen ones and it looked so weird. I saw it last time I went for my usual, but I kept looking at the art and like a Lovecraftian horror the longer I looked at it the worse the details appeared. It literally affected my appetite because psychologically I couldn't help but think I was ordering some freak-ass food as depicted in the new ai-gen pictures, and the ramen just didn't taste as good to me that day. And I don't think I'll go back anymore :(

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 13 points 18 hours ago

You should tell them

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It’s always an “it’s inevitable” argument.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

It's also inevitable their pop-up gets replaced by humanoid robots next year, using the same logic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

OpenAI had their little failure of a presentation recently, and they're introducing a "fast response" tier for 6x the current subscription cost. This is their attempt to get people used to higher pricing. They are bleeding money, and they will need to raise prices sooner than later to start attempting to make it back.

Once they do, a good chunk of their customers will simply stop paying, forcing the AI companies to further raise prices, causing more customers to leave, etc.

AI companies are trying (and failing) to be indispensable, and they need that to have any hope of survival. It's only a matter of time before they collapse, and only then might we see what's actually beneficial about machine learning.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 31 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I saw a meme recently- WinRAR is more profitable than OpenAI. Kind of funny to think about

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah but how do we PROFIT off of it?! Fuck capitalism because this is a valid question

[–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

An investment that would pay off if the tech industry went to hell would be Put options on QQQ (an ETF that tracks the NASDAQ-100). You have to get both the timing and the drop correct, and better funded groups with much faster computers AND the ability to make trades to prop up the market while they unload their shit will be competing against you (every options trade has an opposite side and most of them expire worthless). Watch the movies Margin Call and The Big Short for research as much as playing the lottery can be researched (they're good movies so it's time well spent anyway). Make a movie night out of it and watch The Other Guys which was directed by the same guy who directed The Big Short. Watch through the end credits.

I didn't read the article because gizmodo, but as other people here have said, Dr. Burry (he's played by Christian Bale in The Big Short) often thinks things are going to go south, and there's usually reason to think so, but in general as Warren Buffett could easily have said, "stonks only go up." NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT make around 15% or so of the entire world stock market and around 20% of the US market. Nobody's going to let them collapse and even without the AI craze they still have all the other stuff to fall back on. Thumbs will go on the scale to an extent even greater than the 2008 collapse.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›