this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
99 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck AI

8391 readers
1152 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
99
If this survey is any indication, Audacity wants to add generative AI because of course they do (media.piefed.world)
submitted 15 hours ago by daggermoon@piefed.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/mildlyinfuriating/p/1444350/if-this-survey-is-any-indication-audacity-wants-to-add-generative-ai-because-of-course-t

Link to the survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe3ClP3sHiEQZmwwPMiJ3OzUO586yInWIME076unOdV9kG5-Q/viewform

I was invited to partake upon opening the software. I thought Lemmy might get a kick out of this.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SourDragon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The fact they are asking, means they are considering. And that's grounds for uninstalling it and looking for an alternative.

[–] BauerBender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

IMO Audacity isn’t really great for music if that’s what you’re doing. Reaper is LEGIT.

[–] TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.org 35 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What I see is them asking whether or not their users want to see "AI" in Audacity and that sounds like a perfectly fine thing to survey for. There is also an option for a custom response, go answer with something like "I will stop using Audacity if AI functionality gets implemented" if you care about it.

On the other hand, I think Audacity has been using LLMs on the development side for a while now and Tenacity exists with a clear no-slop policy.

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And tenacity doesn't try to push online subscriptions to stuff I don't need, and closed source

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

You mean open source right?

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

The only areas I’d would use “AI” in Audacity would be to better clean up background noises more easily and possibly split tracks up so I could maybe hear the voices better or instuments better depending on the scenario. GenAI is a hard no otherwise.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What about AI instruments following a human composed score?

[–] sonic_veemo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

We’ve had synthetic instruments for about as long as we’ve had audio output, I don’t think AI can really add much more.

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

That and image upscaling (like waifu2x) are AI software I don't actually mind. Although I'd want to have proper ethical suite (aka disclose the training data, open source models, runs on your device)