this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12563 readers
620 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

In his case, Pearce did not report any income, but erroneously stated he had paid millions in taxes since 2016 and wanted it refunded.

Uhm.. fraudulently stated, not 'erroneously'. WTF! Jeebus, is there any way the rest of us Canadians can sue these selfish grifters or the govt to get our money back? Any fraud like this will come out of our future income as additional taxes.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think the CBC can say "fraudulently" because fraud is a crime and he hasn't been charged, let alone convicted.

"Allegedly" doesn't work, because the facts aren't in dispute.

But I agree, "erroneously" also seems wrong. They probably should have just left the adverb out of it.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Sure they can, the truth is an absolute defense.

It doesn't matter of anyone else does that shit in error, it's still fraud.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Seems to me the obvious thing here would be to check and see if the money had actually been paid to the government, and if it hadn’t, to a) begin fraud charges and b) get that money back.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Of the money the CRA had wrongly paid out, $4 million had already been transferred to other banks or spent on purchases.

good luck to the government

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Seize everything.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

It's incredible... see this https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/cra-bogus-refund-9.7165058

Basically, the woman when she filled her taxes, put an earning of $9,999,999 and in the box "tax paid" she also put $9,999,999 which would mean 100% tax rate, the software correct it saying she is eligible for a $4,958,716.63 refund, and guess what, she got it!

WTF‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

I mean he is right. And this isn't the only time something like this has happened. Also why have they not been charged with fraud. Are there any rules anymore or is everyone afraid to enforce them.