this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
349 points (88.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

42634 readers
4860 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 87 points 5 days ago (10 children)
[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I didn't see any sign of AI when I checked.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 57 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Why use an AI image for the folding phone when they're are literally tens of thousands of images of foldables elsewhere?

There is honestly no real justification for creating slop images for a meme or really anything. Last I checked, stock image companies or image copyrighters don't file lawsuits against creators of memes for badly cropping a stock photo and putting text on top of it.

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 54 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I took the first image from duckduckgo where the "no AI" filter is on. All the images I post are edited in GIMP alone, by my own untalented hands.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fair enough honestly, it's unfortunate how large of a pool of AI images aren't labelled as such, and that the only feasible way to get them labelled after the fact is [at least in the case of duckduckgo,] to gather feedback data given by people who search and know that there is the "flag AI generated image" button.

I suppose indentifying AI images is easier said than done, and requires at training and good enough pattern recognition, so it doesn't mean everyone has to become an expert at recognising them, it really means that these images are flooding everywhere and are a great reason to fervently oppose generative AI.

At this point, I'd say if you want to avoid AI images, you need to see enough of them to find what makes them look off, and with enough time it becomes second nature to discriminate images based on how real they appear.

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Since we're giving out advice: Your original comment was very quick to put me in the slop corner. I just want to shitpost, I'm on your side, and as you correctly assumed I don't want to become an AI expert. Hanlon's razor wouldn't have hurt here.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Why does the iphone on the left just look wrong somehow?

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 100 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

they used an ai image instead of one of the thousands of actual product images

edit: it could be because op searched for "iphone fold" instead of "iphone duo". The "iphone fold" results are full of AI / concept images. I don't think there was a real Iphone duo in the first few results.

[–] programmerlexi@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

When searching for product images, this is the top result on duckduckgo with ai images disabled. Seems disabling ai images is useless...

Edit: correction, when you search for "iphone fold", searching "iphone duo" yields correct images

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Disabling ai images isn't useless, it does filter out a large portion of ai images even though it is far from perfect.

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago

Huh, this could be it. I searched on ecosia for iphone duo. I compared the results from iphone fold and duo and damn, the fold search is full of ai / concept images

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

I assumed as much. It looks like it's bending backwards.

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It wasn't intentional. In my defense I've stopped wondering about Apple features making sense long ago

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

yeah, i think it is ass that the search engines are full of AI shit now

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It shouldn't fold in this direction, it closes the other way

[–] Varesti@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago

It folds in this direction... Once.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

folds it hamburger-style like this?

[–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

But it's not OPs fault. They chose a picture from a search with AI images filtered out.

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

There is just one iphone on the picture

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

It's an IPhone, that's why. 🙃

[–] Varesti@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I've had a folding phone for 3 years and I've never gotten sand in it, pocket or otherwise.

But I also don't crack my screens on my phones.

[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I usually do crack on my phones screen.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

I have one too. I've gotten all sorts of things inside the inner screen. Once I even accidentally closed it with a key in it (basically folded it while putting it in pocket where keys are). Realized only after arriving home and pulling out my phone with key in it. Dust, manufacturing materials (I work in a factory), ectera ectera.

What has saved me all this time is simply a nillkin case that has a hinge protector (dust, falls, etc.) and creates a small gap between the screens when you close, so whatever dust gets inside is never really pressed between the screens.

I went with OnePlus Open. Samsung had weird screen ratios and pixel was just meh in comparison.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which model did you get? I wanted one for some time now, but I really feel nervous about the screen just deciding to go the way of the dodo after 2 years and leaving me with a brick.

[–] Varesti@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The original Pixel Fold. I didn't like the dimensions of the Samsung ones closed and I didn't really feel like importing an Oppo or something like that.

The camera died after a year and I had to get it replaced, but I had insurance, so it wasn't a big deal. The screens still work like they're new and the hinge is fine.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Pocket sand always wins. Over time, it grinds exceedingly fine.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

If you want to ensure it's victory combine it with a credit card in the same pocket for maximum destruction

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Does pocket sand also not ruin a regular phone?

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

The sand is pressed harder against the screen if it's being pressed by another screen than if it's being pressed by the fabric of your pocket.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

There is also a concern that sand can get in the hinge, and there are small gaps around the screen at the hinge so sand can actually get behind/under the screen

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

My non folding phone has some screen scratches from pocket sand. It's the first phone in ages where this has been a problem.

load more comments
view more: next ›