this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

8634 readers
2150 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is no tough road, we just dont want it.

AI is like duping / hacking in items in a video game. Its just not the same as earning it yourself. When we watch a video that is clearly AI we know its an amalgamation of stolen material from real humans who you could have just hired.

I was learning about that math problem AI "solved" recently (the one about fluid dynamics). It was so on brand for AI to swoop in at the end and solve the problem on the backs of every piece of research that came before it and then claim the win as if it earned its spot at the proverbial podium.

[–] tquid@piefed.ca 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Thank you! What a shit headline, casting AI "filmmaking" as some sort of fucking plucky upstart.

[–] Thassodar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How did it cost $1.5 million dollars to input a prompt and then, when it doesn't generate what you want, retyping that prompt with a "what I meant wuz"?

Seems like the Infinite Monkey Theorem, since it can try an infinite amount of times trying to create something a human would.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Because they have to pay for their AI in China.

People get executed for fraud and embezzlement in China (which, to be clear, is good).

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Every time it tries it costs money.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They didn’t even swoop in at the last minute and solve shit

They literally stole the work and the answer from a real mathematician who had completed the equation but not yet published.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

Lmao even better. Somehow more fitting than what I initially thought happened.

I'd be furious.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 3 days ago

Who is funding this shit?

[–] umbraroze@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

I hope that in the future, we look back at "the world's first fully AI generated [X]" with the same kind of attitude how we look back at UFOlogists who kept saying "probably the most well-documented UFO encounter in history." (...they say that about all of them)

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

$181k scammed from victims.

They'd have to pay me, by the minute, to watch AI slop.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 7 points 3 days ago

I love good news.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago

LMAO… more of this. It’s rare nowadays to get good news.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago

If you thought this was a good idea, I'm glad that you lost your job.

[–] BriniaSona@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

1.5m now, how much cheaper in 5 years?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

It's getting more expensive.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

4.7m, due to the loss of talent capable of bringing it to sufficient quality and the cost of gen ai reaching profitability.