this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
80 points (96.5% liked)

People Twitter

10561 readers
215 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician
  1. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuckReddit_letitdie@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Why would one assume that in the first place. The formula is meant for a perfect sphere. A perfect sphere has the lowest surface area possible for a spheroid. Any imperfection adds surface area.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 11 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

There was a fallacious explanation for this floating around a long time ago basically starting with a triangle and adding sides to the polygon 1 at a time, making the claim that it gets closer to being a circle each time but never actually becomes a perfect circle. It then made the claim that a perfect circle, therefore, is a polygon with infinite sides and as a result has infinite surface area. If someone is just... really gullible, gave it zero actual thought, and hasn't taken middle school level math, it could have been convincing.

[–] swicano@programming.dev 8 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

Ohhh, it's like they got the first half of a riemann sum type explanation for curve integration, and started daydreaming halfway through

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

Or o fFinite Element triangulation

[–] FuckReddit_letitdie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 50 minutes ago

It hurts me to know that this is a real thing and plenty of people ate it up.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

But is a perfectly straight section of coastline infinite?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

The opposite even. The more imperfect the sphere the more surface area it has.

[–] garth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

Coastline paradox, now in 3D!

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

Really depends on the imperfections

You can hand-craft imperfections to make the surface infinite, but you can also keep it constant or add very little

[–] dog@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Slopini says it so I need to double check