this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

8729 readers
2098 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.

Effective reports:

Less effective reports:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 26 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

I think "fled" is the wrong word here. "Fled" means "running from" which implies some sort of conscious decision making usually reserved for living things. If you throw a rock and it bounces off Sam Altman's head, you don't say the rock fled from Sam. You just say "Nice shot"

[–] zero924@piefed.social 2 points 21 minutes ago

If a driver hits someone without realizing it and drives off to continue their day, that's still legally fleeing the scene

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

sometimes there are remote workers (...Another Indian) who drive these things.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

That's wild to think we've managed to outsource the very act of driving to another country. Nothing drives innovation quite like capitalism 🫠

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 7 points 5 hours ago

It's a mix. They're like a Sim in The Sims, humans give them instructions and then they run path finding trying to implement it. The humans can take full control if the robots gets completely confused.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 0 points 5 hours ago

Right but if we say “fled” we can get everyone all riled up and increase our engagement metrics.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 16 points 5 hours ago

As the spokesperson put it, the robot’s actions may legally constitute fleeing the scene of a traffic incident, meaning Starship Technologies could very well be on the hook for the incident.

Good. Nail them to the wall.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's funny how everyone is getting riled up about this story. You're only hearing about it because it's unusual. Over 100 people die on the road every day in America, die at the hands of human drivers, not bots.

Flip it around. Wouldn't this seem an odd story if a pedestrian or driver caused this accident? No one would care.

[–] TheQuadel@feddit.org 1 points 36 minutes ago

How any cars are there one the road everyday? And how many of these "robots"? Put it in perspective.