this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
552 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

74461 readers
2227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

While The title of the video is absolutely one of sensationalism, It's not out of the question as two more strikes could indeed delete a channel...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] toad31@lemmy.cif.su 29 points 19 hours ago (22 children)

He should be on PeerTube, anyways.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I do not understand why creators feel the need to be exclusively on one platform. Simply crosspost the videos.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

$$$ that's why. YouTube gives the greatest return. If they post to multiple platforms, not only is it more work, but they then also subtract from the number of views they get on YouTube. It's all about the $$$.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In their documentary GamersNexus stated that they would air it without advertisements if a certain treshold of funding was reached. I imagine Patreon, their store and other sources make GamersNexus more money than Youtube advertisement. And it is certainly not their only source.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If those other sources make more money and get more viewers, why did it start on YouTube?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

That is where the majority of the audience is.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 19 hours ago

Stop building houses on the king's land.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 61 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Time for them to at minimum mirror their channel to Odysee and/or PeerTube so that they'll still have a platform just in case their channel gets nuked.

Even if you don't plan on ditching YT outright, it's still a good idea to mirror to Odysee, PeerTube, or both, as a backup because of shit like this.

[–] helmet91@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That was my first thought as well. As he's touching into these sort of topics, where he has to defend himself against companies with the greatest capital in the world, he won't stand a chance to survive on these traditional platforms. He definitely needs to launch a PeerTube instance.

But the thing is, with this size of a channel, it would cost a lot of money to maintain it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 189 points 1 day ago

I love that he responded to their takedown request by releasing an entire video about Bloomberg and their shitfuckery.

[–] 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 day ago

Bloomberg’s lawyer to Steve: how DARE you contact us without going through another lawyer

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (21 children)

How is his channel going to be deleted? They appealed the take down and YouTube will reinstate the video in a matter of 10 days if Bloomberg failed to produce proof that he used their copy right shit. I'm actually genuinely asking because I watched the whole video and Steve didn't say anything about their channel being deleted.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 38 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Bloomberg has 10 days to file for lawsuit against Gamers Nexus. If they do, the take down stands, and it's a strike until Gamers Nexus may win the case. Which will be expensive. 3 strikes and YouTube closes the channel with near zero option for appeal.

Gamers Nexus cannot manage if a big company like Bloomberg goes all in. They can easily bankrupt a small channel like Gamers Nexus with frivolous lawsuits. And if you are bankrupt, you can't defend yourself.

The US judicial system is heavily tilted towards those that have more money.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

"small."

Make no mistake. Gamers Nexus is a multi million dollar company.

Sure, Bloomberg is much, much bigger. But while gamers Nexus is the underdog, it's not the toothless underdog. That little fucker will bite in bloomberg's ankles before it dies and tbf: it looks like it's already yapping and took it's first bite.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maaneeack@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago (11 children)

3 dmca/copyright strikes on a channel and yt deletes you. It was mentioned near the beginning of the video.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would assume its in reference to the section of the video quoting YouTube's policies that channels can be removed after 3 copyright strikes. Bloomberg has 10 days to appeal to YouTube and keep the strike active

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›