this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
257 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

74461 readers
2316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Starting next year, Google will begin to verify the identities of developers distributing their apps on Android devices, not just those who distribute via the Play Store.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Balldowern@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 minutes ago

So I guess my next phone will be a Chinese phone. Even if it spies on me, I'll have the freedom to install whatever I want from anywhere.

The Chinese have a golden window of opportunity. Let's hope they don't mess this up.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 hour ago

In short, they make independent stores impossible?

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 36 minutes ago

And here I thought I wouldn't root or flash my next phone.

[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 24 points 3 hours ago

linux phones please hurry!

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It really is past time we saw serious work on a mobile flavor of Linux. Not AOSP, not anything whatsoever downstream of Google, but a regular Linux distro with a mobile friendly DTE.

[–] FryHyde@lemmy.zip 2 points 56 minutes ago

Isn't that what Ubuntu Touch is?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 41 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Hasn’t Apple been losing in court across the world for doing exactly this?

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago

No, it's nothing like what Apple's been doing.

Apple has been losing in court about everyone needs to give them money anytime anything makes any money on iOS, or even thinking absolutely allowing others to install anything beyond their App Store.

This is Google demanding every app that can be installed on Android must be signed by them, and the only cost is registering with them your name and address, possibly verified by government ID. (And quite possible doxxing you at the same time as they already do on the Play Store....)

These are very different, and unlike Apple, will more likely be applauded by numerous world governments in the current "anything a child can even remotely even know about" must have its users be checked to make sure they are "allowed to".

[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This is awful. One of my favorite differences between Android and iOS, as both a user AND developer is sideloading.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 hours ago

The closer google gets to apple, the more similar they become. Except apples shit generally all works well together. Knock off air tags, chromecast, audio groups, and so many other things are riddled with bugs and never fixed.

If you make android the same as iOS, I might as well switch.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 7 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Sideloading still works, just the apps have to be signed. Still awfull.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I highly doubt they'll sign Torrent clients.

(Yes I torrent on my phone, cuz why not lol :P)

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Torrent clients are not illegal in any way. So why not?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Idk, apple doesn't allow them on their app store.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

Right sorry. I thought you meant developers won't sign them. Obviously you mean Google.

I hope Google at least will only sign identities, e.g. you really are DeathByBigSad and this is your key which you can sign apps with. Not look at the apps themselves. That may be too much to hope for. :(

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

How many great apps will we lose because of this, though?

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What's extra funny is that I already did all of this, and yet, I've been informed that my developer account is subject to deletion because I'm not active enough. Since my game does not get regular updates I said F this, let them delete my account. It's still available for sideload on itch.io anyway. Jokes on me for believing that.

So yeah, it seems like Google is actively hostile towards building a library of software/games that just work and intentionally only wants live service garbage apps on their platform because those make more revenue.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

I'd say a big ton of them :(

[–] Integrate777@discuss.online 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Can Nintendo request Google revoke authorization for emulator developers? Or publishers requesting revoking any of the hugely popular manga aggregator apps. Or maybe they'll just outright refuse them from the start, like they will with revanced.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 6 points 2 hours ago

I'm on your side and you are correct, besides Google amassing a ton of money (each registration costs $25) they will have total control and we know that Google is far beyond "not evil".

[–] ratzki@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This will not apply to GrapheneOS, right?

I highly doubt it

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Permissive licenses were a mistake.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Isn't AOSP mostly GPL?

[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 33 points 7 hours ago

I guess it's time to switch to developing apps for Linux mobile distro

The only reason I like android is cuz I can make my own apks and use them without issue.

[–] Superorbit@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 hours ago

Fuck that's actually really bad

[–] cookie019@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If I understood correctly they use DMA as an additional justification. Thank you, EU parlament.

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 47 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

There dies the last remaining reason to use Android.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 23 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You say that like there's a better alternative

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

There's iOS. It works great, but has no real sideloading. Android works meh, but had proper sideloading. Now Android will no longer have it, so you might as well bite the bullet on the OS with better hardware integration.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Apple is basically the default (at least in the US) so if Android cant offer significantly more theres not much reason to use it

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

iPhones are too expensive for some people. Not everyone has $500 lying around.

You can't get an iPhone for $100, an unlocked Motorola phone is only about $100, if you get a carrier locked version its like $30-$40 (and you can carrier unlock them 60 days after activation, just get the cheapest 30 day plan will do, you don't even need 60 days of service to get it unlocked.

Pricing wise, Android phones will still have advantages, even with google's autocratization.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] padge@lemmy.zip 19 points 7 hours ago

They're already starting to clamp down on sideloading. I use Aurora Store out of principle, but it's getting more and more common that apps will refuse to launch if not downloaded from the Play Store. I get the risk of sideloading maliciously modified banking apps or whatever, but surely you could just compare a checksum or something?

load more comments
view more: next ›