this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
367 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

74496 readers
3265 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it a conspiracy? For months, YouTubers have been quietly griping that something looked off in their recent video uploads. Following a deeper analysis by a popular music channel, Google has now confirmed that it has been testing a feature that uses AI to artificially enhance videos. The company claims this is part of its effort to "provide the best video quality," but it's odd that it began doing so without notifying creators or offering any way to opt out of the experiment.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

"enhancement"

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 17 points 18 hours ago

I have noticed that some of the regular creators I watch seem to look a little AI lately. I honestly have been questioning reality a bit; that’s probably the point.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago

Tinkering in this way with someone‘s work should be regarded as copyright infringement regardless of what their TOS say. It shouldn‘t be allowed and Youtube should pay up big time for this theft. But of course this is probably not how it‘s going to be handled because Google is mega rich and the law does not apply to AI somehow.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago

I'm sure they also trained their models on all the content at the same time too.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 91 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Although, this is a distinction without a difference—it's still AI of a sort being used to modify videos.

It's actually a big difference. "AI" is an almost meaningless term without specifying what type of AI it is. ChatGPT is an AI, Sora is an AI, the "magic eraser" in your photos app is an AI, the AOL chatbot "SmarterChild" was also AI. "AI" can mean almost anything even remotely adjacent to "machine learning" right now. Just calling a tool "AI" says literally nothing about what the tool is or what it does. This sort of reductive, dismissive attitude toward anything an author doesn't understand in tech articles is getting really worrying lately.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

When all the music “radio stations” effectively changed nothing but called their algorithms “AI” to follow the hype.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 8 points 18 hours ago

"AI" can mean almost anything even remotely adjacent to "machine learning" right now.

And that's why it's become a meaningless term. If that's what we're being told we're supposed to call it then that's what we're going to call it. Blame greedy companies marketing for that, not the journalists and people trying to make sense of the endless stream of meaningless garbage pouring out of these so-called "AI" companies.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 15 points 23 hours ago

Real "AI" doesn't exist anyway. We may as well call it Algorithmic Idiocy.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fucking hell all the dispotian AI taking over ruling the world shit and no one predicted the much more boring version: a company unleashing a half-assed AI to make their stupid services more profitable and steal all your data and rights to make it happen.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s a more boring version of the larger thing happening: ruling class decided it’s YOLO time, screw what the middle and lower class think. Buy a dictator, merge the military with the prisons, take over whatever you can laws and legacy be damned.

[–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

America is at the ‘looting the coffers’ stage of imperial collapse

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

RIP MLG videos

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The app wouldn't start on my roku. It said "can't start because there's not enough space" so I deleted YouTube.

LOL fuck you YouTube assholes! I can't believe it was that easy. Good riddance!

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't say I like how you arrived at this conclusion, but I do like that you arrived at it. Fuck em

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well I started deleting apps like crazy and it would still not run. So I did the next best thing and got rid of the problem all together!

It was freeing!

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Heeeellll yeah dude. You know what, I didn't have the full picture, I do like how you got here.

Next steps. Old PC that's too slow? Fuuuuck Roku,nrhsyre selling your data anyway. Look up how to throw a little shitter Linux distro on there, get an adapter for your TV and a cheap mini keyboard and remote. The world is your oyster.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nvidia has been upscaling content for users using the Nvidia shield since I think the 2019 revision, and I think offers the driver level video streaming upscale since 2023 with RTX Video Super Resolution. The concept isn't exactly new (and there are video players that basically have 3rd party upscale algorithms, doesn't need to be "AI" to do so)

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Almost every TV has this built in too. Upscaling is not what people are complaining about.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

They airbrushed people's faces.

If a computer changed my face because I'm too ugly for advertisers I'd fucking kill myself.

Humiliating. Degrading. Dehumanizing.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 6 points 18 hours ago

Killing yourself in that scenario seems like you've selected the wrong target. It's certainly not yourself's fault.

Being unapologetically and relentlessly human is the best revenge we can get on these dehumanizing technologies, and to be human you need to first and foremost be alive.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

I knew I recognized the AI smear face tell sign. I saw people I used to watch and I thought, why do their videos look so strange all of a sudden. Like it's AI or something.

  • Faces looked smudged
  • Contrast was too high
  • Sometimes weird lighting and odd things happening with the frame rate
  • Even looked like puppets lip syncing sometimes

I was like 🤔 this has many of the signs of AI video. Wtf is going on here.

LO AND BEHOLD. I knew I wasn't going crazy.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

face smoothing is a side effect of AI upscaling, i doubt that was the goal.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nvidia's stuff is AI, but things like MadVR and stuff aren't. Even older upscales like ESRGAN is ML based, but not necessarily AI, as the terms been pretty diluted. if anyone wants to CLAIM that its AI, then you'd have to understand many of these algorithms existed before the modern use of FP16/FP8/Int8 based acceleration existed which defines the modern AI stuff.

I should also mention, the Shield Pro's upscale was also pre Turing. the Nvidia Tegra X1 is Maxwell based.