1egg4u

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

When you say "someones rights to conflict" you're saying someone has a right to not support gender diversity in this context

Im not engaging with that and you dont have a "right" to not like gender diversity

There is no "both sides" to accepting LGBTQ+ people

[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, im criticizing their argument. You dont get to say trans acceptance is a "both sides" issue full stop.

[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

This is a minefield of a comment that is way above my pay grade...

You dont have a "right" to deny a group of people public existence. You never did. That isnt how any of that works.

[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago

🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

There arent "two sides" to accepting the existence of a group of people

There is acceptance and there isnt. You dont get to say people who dont believe that trans people exist have some kind of valid argument.

You wouldnt say this shit about the civil rights movement

This is a human rights issue. Trans rights are human rights. If you dont think that you shouldn't be participating in a discussion about trans inclusion.

view more: ‹ prev next ›