Thanks! I will give it a watch.
It does seem to suck. I hope it can get better.
Edit: Right, so in summary there is no regulation at all on American HOAs and they are also easily taken over by private companies. Makes sense they are bad. Though it's still astonishing that an organisation can be so unregulated that it can enforce more fines than the local government, without any oversight.
Can someone explain why there are so many stories of bad HOAs in America? Don't everyone in the HOA get to vote on who will be on the board and what rules there should be? Why do many of them seem to have strange and petty rules? What makes them able to issue fines for so small infractions? Where does the fine money go? Who sets up the HOA in the first place and what is the motivation to do so?
We got plenty of similar associations where I live (both for apartments and houses, though not so often for fully detached homes) and they usually work great. Basically you pay a monthly fee to your HOA that the board use to keep the plumbing and outside areas maintained, pay for tv/internet for everyone at a much reduced cost or maintain other common areas like laundry rooms, guest apartment, parking garage, workshop etc. There are of course some restrictions too you need to follow, but those are usually minor and common sense anyways (like you shouldn't play very loud music too late in an apartment in the middle of the week) and that you don't get to do whatever you want to the outside of your place.
(Another common rule is that you need HOA approval to sublet your apartment. This can be occasionally annoying to deal with, but is good because it prevents people from buying up apartments just to rent them out. And most of the time the HOA will approve you if you're just moving away for a year or similar.)
In fact, functional cookies, that are only used for page functionality, like remembering your dark mode preference on the site itself, does not require consent under GDPR. Consent is only required for tracking cookies: cookies that are used to identify you (and then usually to remember what you've looked at, purchased before, etc).
Unfortunately, because the law is not entirely clear, and because a lot of people don't know exactly what cookies are or do, even sites that don't even have tracking cookies have added consent banners just in case. And sites that don't care have added banners without an equally visible "reject all" button, the absence of which doesn't even make them compliant (but probably enough that they feel they can claim they thought they were).
I don't have a spouse, no. But in this subthread we were discussing time available for recreation in general, and I personally definitely count spending time with family as recreation.
And yes, If I'm not visiting family I do have time to sit in front of a computer for 14 hours on a Saturday, or paint, or go for a full-day biking trip, or anything else I want to do :) Why wouldn't I?
What I think some people do is take on responsibilities that they they think they "should" have, but not really appreciate the rewards of. Like cleaning their house every other day, or getting a pet, or a pool they don't want to clean and barely use, or a too big garden they don't really enjoy caring for. All those things will be worth it for some, but a burden for many others..
But that's why I'm asking, I want to verify if this is true or what else other people do when they say they don't have time to have fun and relax.
Never tried it and don't really want to! Been thinking the same as you. Seems like a privacy nightmare too.
Would be cool to stream my entire pc in-home though so I could get rid of all fan sounds by putting it in a closet or something, but haven't been something I've prioritised to experiment with.
Only 2 hours of recreation a day seems like a terrible time to me, unless you have kids, in which case I get that's how it is when they're small.
I spend like 1 hour in the morning to get ready and travel to work, then about the same to get home and have dinner. Let's say 1 hour for chores every day (though even if I do both laundry and cleaning the same day it won't take that long, and I don't do those every day.) That leaves me with at least 5 hours a day for recreation.
But weekends are 14 hours of recreation per day, not 6.5 surely? 8 hours sleep + 2 hours for some extra time to cook good food etc. and we already did most chores during the week.
I sometimes spend a weekend gaming, but most of the time many of those hours are spent on a variety of things like visiting family, sports, crafts, going downtown etc. because I like a lot of different recreation. But yeah, we can certainly agree on fuck arbitrary restrictions, and everyone should be able to own their own things. Would just be very interested to know where you are coming from with those numbers.
I can only imagine you might be in the US and a lot of it is driving? That seems to suck, I would hate to drive for hours every day :(
No, not if you own your own card/gaming pc. This is about their cloud gaming service where the game is run on their servers and streamed to you.
They can, and I think it makes a lot of sense.
Lets say you start a lawncare business and buy a lawnmower for $1000. You don't manage to get that many customers the first year, and only make exactly $1000. You haven't lost money, but didn't make any profit either.
Should you now have to pay tax on those $1000 dollars of revenue, causing you to have lost money despite your hard work? Where would you even get that money from to pay the tax?
I think the problem is not the basic system, but that the rules are too complex and have loopholes that allow you to pay less tax if you are an expert on the rules - or have enough money that it's worth it to hire one.