FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 29 points 6 days ago (4 children)

medieval times

when I was a kid

...hmmm

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 48 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

devs? yeah, no.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 4 weeks ago

if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.

If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.

Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.

Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 4 weeks ago

I agree, large cars are generally much more lethal to pedestrians, due to their shape, not kinetic energy.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

Thats not how kinetic energy works, no pedestrian is heavy enough to stop any car, small or large.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 1 month ago

eh, you know what, fair enough!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 33 points 1 month ago (37 children)

oh wow I didn't know that!

would make sense to give more a lot incentives for EV buying if so!

 

I just noticed multiple websites show this error. This isn't just me, right?

view more: next ›