banning it? Like make a law, and make it a crime, or make a new law that clarifies that it's already breaking a tonne of laws
Mathium05
joined 2 weeks ago
Then what's the point of saying that line? It's a pointless line that means to put down any solution to the problem saying "well, actually, it'll never go away!" instead of thinking about how one could drastically reduce the harm by trying to make it go away anyways
That is a solution, make it very unappealing to use it. If it's clearly a crime, most people don't have the hardware to do it, and others don't have the motivation, it'd help a lot. And again, NFTs
"AI is never going away" neither did NFTs nor crime, nor anything else really. We should try to stop these awful companies from doing awful things.
Ban the slop easy as, they're breaking a tonne of laws, and they're pushing their costs onto everyone else.
Alignment is a real thing, though it can be a less than apt description. Mostly the goals you write out and the goals you want to happen not being the same thing. You can also have alignment issues where the dataset doesn't match the real data in some way and the classifications break down. (I am not an AI defender I am very anti-AI)
That cliche is the worst. If applied to anything else you can see how absurd it is. Like NFTs aren't going anywhere, crime isn't going anywhere, etc.
No, that would be bad, but not misaligned necessarily. That's a different issue really. Like lets say you use ML to make an AI to play a video game and the goal is always on the right side, but after you're done training, it's on the left now, the AI might have not learned go the goal, but go to the right.