NannerBanner

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 points 4 hours ago

It's more about the threat, isn't it? If the other side believes you might be suicidally crazy, they might not want to fight the war, even if otherwise it would be a one sided victory.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 points 4 hours ago

Don't discount the ability of people to follow simple directions and manuals. Also, don't discount that there are a large number of otherwise intelligent people who are maga. They have plenty of people who can do calculus, program in an IDE or on a circuit board, and carry on with all the other things you might view as impossible to ever happen at a republican convention. We all have strengths and weaknesses, and few are immune to propaganda. There seem to be a large number of people who have a peculiar weakness to 'simple' logic and strongmen blowing their own horn.

Anyway, without going into the weeds, let's just take a moment and appreciate that there was a very long and large chain of command that carried out the literal listed example of a war crime on pete's orders. There would absolutely be no issue for them to secure the weapons for a red government that told them to do such a thing.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed on the number of bad ones. I just read the first book of a james patterson series, and I don't understand how it was ever greenlit. I know there was that quote about 90% of everything being trash, and it was just 'in the old days' that we never saw anything but the 10%, but I just struggle to see harry potter now as part of the 10%. I've read too many good books and series to believe it does have a place in the 10%. I know, on some level, that they aren't that bad, but I just have this whiplash from the feelings I had about them as a kid and how I read them now.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 2 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

The economics of the red states will pale in comparison to the question of where the weapons end up. There are a lot of nuclear weapons in deep red areas.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 points 16 hours ago

The poisonwood bible. I loved it in high school, because I was an oppressed little atheist/agnostic with hyper religious parents at a christian school. It was brilliant, vivid, groundbreaking, and wild in its defiance of cultural norms...

and now it's just a sort of sad story of how the christian mindset mirrors colonial/empire ambitions and everyone gets hurt.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh my god. I never even thought about black beauty influencing me. I always chalked it up to robin hood, star fox and some weird fusion of the dragonriders of pern and the heralds of valdemar.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

The books are good for what they are: children's books that take you from ~8-13 years old. I loved them when I was a kid, and now it's just hard to get through them because the writing is just average at best, and the plots are so basic they undermine the actually interesting setting and prevent it from being as mindblowing as they could have been.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

He seems almost entirely complacent about the other aspects of his and everyone else’s oppression. He even scoffs at the rumors of rebellions and mocks those who would try. The one thing he cares about is his lack of sex.

gestures wildly around at america

I think that's the most humanizing and realistic part of the writing, honestly.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 points 16 hours ago

That's odd; I'm almost the opposite. I definitely enjoyed lord of the rings more as a teenager, and struggle to really even appreciate them now. I still like the world, but the writing just seems off.

Meanwhile the 'small town' has everything bad about cities, but they simply gloss over it.

Was this an ad? Then yes. Is it a crappy phone picture ad? Then maybe. Is this a crappy phone picture of someone's measly deep dish? Then no.

It's a no pasta lasagna.

view more: next ›