this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
510 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

10160 readers
3800 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Throw it on the pile? I guess?

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago

One century of presidential earnings while in office, everything earned - all presidents combined - $40 million USD of getting “rich”.

Trump, one year. 3 billion in personal enrichment. Planes, “donations”, etc.

Corruption laid bare. Everything the reich wing said they hated about Hillary, Bill, Pelosi, Obama making money on the job. Not a peep about this. Not. One. Word.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 hours ago

I'm sure a decent person in the Nazied States of America will soon bring the orange child rapist to justice. Any moment now one of them will grow a spine and arrest the obese imbecile and the other cronies...

Any minute now
...soon

...just you wait
...
...it'll happen

...mark my words ...
...

... {crickets}

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 153 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Normalizing the lack of consequences will be horrible to manage in the future. Any administration that wants to do any enforcement will have to deal with years of precedent of inaction.

'You want to punish me? Where was your 'righteous indignity' and your 'laws' when trump was in charge?'

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 44 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

That's why I say we have to either split the union and all be separate (free to join into smaller groups), or we just rewrite the constitution and remake the government from the ground up.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

We have to do the latter regardless because we've proven the current ones are fundamentally broken and all it took was to act in bad faith. Literally all of this because there's intentionally no system in place to account for bad faith or no confidence.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

That is actually the exact purpose of the second amendment. So that we the people can replace a government that no longer works for the people of the country.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 18 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I don't think the second option is viable.

You have whole states loving the pedo unconditionally. And they would need to sign a constitution that specifically bars them to try and summon a new trump.

They simply won't sign it. So you better start thinking as separate states that join to stay relevant and hope the red union that will shortly after form doesn't have imperialist aspirations. Otherwise you'll be in for a second civil war.

[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But the economics in the red states would lead to such bad living conditions that people would move, and then the spiral of no money, and no people to fight a war would lead to a very one sided victory.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The economics of the red states will pale in comparison to the question of where the weapons end up. There are a lot of nuclear weapons in deep red areas.

[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

What you say is true, but everybody has lost the game if nukes are used. Their states wont be inhabitable either.

Fortunately the chance of those yokels actually figuring out how to use one is pretty much zero. They're complicated.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago

Ironic given that the secessionist Free State Project was instrumental in Tump's political career

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The only state that has a separate electrical grid is Texas, and it sucks.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

They are in the process of connecting to the national grid actually. I guess they could just disconnect it again

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Well I would imagine in such a scenario there would be large upheavals in state gov too. But you're right.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

'You want to punish me? Where was your 'righteous indignity' and your 'laws' when trump was in charge?'

It didn't start with the orange turd, you wannabe "moral" hypocrites.

Go back, far far back and check if any one of the presidents faced serious repercussions.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Cant think of any president acting in bad faith against the people for personal gain, can you?

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

I'd say the Watergate scandal was pretty significant and still involved consequences (at least compared to now)

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 55 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Wouldn't that be a bad financial decision? Am I stupid??

[–] protist@mander.xyz 101 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

These are corporate bonds, rather than stocks. They will pay out a fixed amount over a given period of time. One might assume this is a down payment for silence

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 30 points 13 hours ago

Oh right, thank you for explaining.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm assuming he didn't so much buy the bonds, but was gifted them.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But why gift him something if he’s going to subpoena you. I’m so confused.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The subpoena was happening either way. But the bonds are a gift to prevent prosecution. Or at least that's how I read it.

Edit: Looking at it another way, buying the bonds could be Trump buying the guys silence when he testifies.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thought the same thing and that's why I'll never be rich.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's not like he has a stellar record when it comes to investments.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Even I know that you shouldn't buy shares in a company that you're (for whatever reason) sure will tank in the near future.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

In that case you'd buy shorts or if you have an appetite for risk, a contract for difference (CFD) or options

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 10 hours ago

Bonds and stocks are very different investment vehicles. In this case it's similar to shorting a stock (betting the price will go down).