OccamsTeapot

joined 1 month ago
[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I see where you're coming from now. I think if you define imperialism in that way, it makes sense that you would consider all of those countries imperialist.

When markets are fully saturated domestically, capital expands outward. Once industrial and bank capital grow, they merge and dominate the entire economy, resulting in the dominance of finance capital in the economy ...

But this whole description seems weird to me. Are there any powerful capitalist countries that could avoid this?

And I still don't think Russia could possibly escape this definition. They have BRICS and are a major oil trader. They physically are trying to occupy another country right now. They use Russian language and state media to influence Eastern European countries in particular.

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 week ago (51 children)

Clearly the EU is an imperialist nazi state made up of multiple different independent nations generally not following fascism and being members on a purely voluntary basis. Did you not receive your shipment of tankie crack this week, comrade?

view more: ‹ prev next ›