If everything is a national emergency, nothing is.
I am appalled at how well "flood the zone" and "move fast and break things" works to destroy a nation. If sanity ever returns, the response to either action needs to be the death penalty. I don't know how to properly write a law for that, but it is clear to me that any lesser response will only cause the bastard to back up, and try again.
What do the rules of professional conduct say about a client who repeatedly and aggressively ignores the law and the orders of the court?
Not being sarcastic here, I'm honestly curious. The lawyer can't control the client, so what do?
We have no guidance or direction on what we need to do,
Wrong. You have plenty of guidance. It's called "the law" and you went to school to learn how to understand it. If your people get instructions to violate the law, the instructions are invalid.
This is not complicated.
I think is milenials are still good. For a few more years. Also, we are the only generation that can save files, and know where they went.
But more youngsters would be nice.
President Miller, you mean?
But desires to be less so.
The positive side effects are usually just the effects.
"Feature Phone" suggests that this was from the late 1900s, or early 2000. Storage limits at the time were impractical.
Exactly. We have a shared system of interests and values. The current regime silly does not participate in it.
Have you seen his competition?
I mean, anyone looking at Win11 is gonna be skeptical about anything Microsoft is putting out.
You're assuming that they know the first damn thing about their strongly held lifelong beliefs about the nature of reality.