TribblesBestFriend

joined 2 years ago

Exactly, they revert back when they saw the public uproar.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Didn’t they ban a Journalist at the request of a Cybersecurity council ?

Short answer : Yes

Long Answer : people are asking their MPs and they are refusing to answer (probably because they know), so people ask around and found out that we [Canadians] are sharing intel with the US Coast Guard which are under the perview of the Hegseth ministry of defence

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People on Twitter now will not quit it over some AI personal data munching.

I think that is used to prove the willingness of the interviewe. « If you want to take a lie detector you’re more prone to saying the truth to the investigators » but I’ve never heard of this done in Canada.

If this is true, I urge her to lawyer up

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Pass a lie detector ? Isn’t non illegible in court so it means nothing ?

Moral of the story : Cops lies. If they promise you a reward be prepared to swindle out of it.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I find the article tedious to read. One phrase, one paragraph that’s sure seems written for people that don’t read.

Ouain ! Fuck You l’Autruche !

Cannot anger my petro-baron friends

Yes by « job » I was meaning : maximizing their profits

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is sparking a « tempête dans un verre d’eau » and it’s not worthy news. That’s no parent that are afraid, that’s an insurer that do is job

view more: ‹ prev next ›