Presumably anyone can, and people democratically vote on which algorithm is used. Direct democracy like this has its problems, but it’s a hell of a lot better than the oligarchy/plutocracy that we’re currently dealing with.
pennomi
joined 2 years ago
Arthur C. Clarke said something along the lines of “communism could’ve worked if only they had microchips” meaning that communism had problems with humans. An algorithmic socialism that requires everything to be fair is the only way to do it.
“Eat the rich” is so much more fun when it’s “make the rich eat each other”.
For sure, though the tyranny of the majority is still strictly better than the tyranny of the minority, which we currently are dealing with.