pooterbroo

joined 1 day ago
[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 4 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

I think the preferred term for that is "gooning" nowadays.

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Plain inference is profitable actually, that's why there are a hundred inference providers on OpenRouter who compete by undercutting each other. The labs however aren't profitable because training the models is a huge drain.

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I know you might be joking and it's funny, but I don't think we should make AI nudes of anyone even if they're attractive.

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 0 points 7 hours ago

Well they didn't even use the latest models in Feb 2025. They should've used DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o3-mini which use additional test time compute to arrive at better answers. They used GPT 3.5 which was about 2½ years old at the time.

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

They presented five generative AI chatbots—Gemini (2.0, Google; version available December 2024), DeepSeek (V3, High-Flyer; version available December 2024), Meta AI (Llama 3.3, Meta; version available December 2024), ChatGPT (3.5, OpenAI; version available November 2022) and Grok (2, xAI; version available August 2024)—with a series of closed- and open-ended prompts across five misinformation-prone categories.

Couldn't the researchers at least bother to use the latest models?