Sorry, I don't quite follow ๐
What's the problematic response?
smiletolerantly
joined 2 years ago
Yay, that's fantastic to hear!
Also, how's your experience been with the PE? Getting a readymade device in a nice shell is appealing for sure ๐
Oh, in the demo gif, that's via a shortcut (holding power for half a second). Sorry, can't help with wakeword there ๐
Very cool. I'll definitely look into that, and let you know back here :D
Glad to be of service... ๐
did you consider metaphone matching?
I did not even know about this. Sounds super interesting. Though it seems to be very language specific?
My original intent was to not rely on language specifics. But maybe we could just define additional steps in the pipeline for specific languages. Hm. I'll have to think about this some more, but it might definitely be a great idea for a future version, so thanks for telling me about it!!
Have fun, hope this works out for you! FYI: you can also use an LLM as an additional fallback (first closest-intent, then on failure, LLM). README mentions it further down on Github.
You mean, the one in the GHSA that was swiftly fixed in accordance with proper protocols?
"Hugely overblown", you mean.
Femboyhead Martin pls.
That ks for sharing this, this is fascinating.
Maybe the underlying rule is: the more you know about something, the more you are aware of its flaws, making the alternatives you know less about more attractive?
I don't really know, sorry :(
If you want to migrate, is going conduit - conduwuit - continuwuity (first version) - continuwuity (current version) maybe an option?
Huh, interesting. Does that work with wildcards like "put x on my shopping list"? Also, what are you using for that, if I may ask?