sneakypersimmon

joined 1 week ago
[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Women riders are already forced to accept a ride from any male or female driver.

How do women riders label male drivers as creeps? After they sexually assault or harass them? That’s what my question to you was - how does putting the onus on individual women riders to report creeps after they’ve done something creepy help those riders?

I agree that there should be a way to report drivers. But you realize that already exists, right? So maybe we could just support more options for women to feel safer?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You can sort by controversial or just open the replies under some other comments. There’s plenty of sexism against women here.

A lot of the nastier comments on lemmy aren’t super in your face, they’re subtle jokes about women being bad drivers or that it’s not fair to say men are violent against women.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

Plus, If women can no longer trust men, and men tend to be pretty upset about it, them just not being together would solve this problem pretty fast

You're completely overlooking the beauty and love in this world in favor of your misanthropic views and I don't and can't agree with you.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today -1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Provoke a discussion.

Ew, I'm not at your beck and call to entertain you and your delusional ideas. It's laughable to push selective gender in utero as more humane than allowing women riders to seek out women drivers. I'm laughing at you.

Shoo.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

Men are not born inherently more violent than women. That's a sexist assumption from the get and invalidates your entire reply to be honest.

Acknowledging the real outcome of the patriarchy that men are encouraged and allowed to use violence to further their own wants is not the same as agreeing that men should be killed or boys shouldn't be born.

What you don’t like is the emotions you feel when I suggest an idea that seems alien to you and have to mentally compare it to a worse idea that sates bitter catharsis or validates your desire to insulate and segregate for the aim of emotional comfort.

It's not an idea that's alien to me, I did ask what in the 4B you were talking about for a reason. I just recognize a violent and sexist idea when I see one and yours is extreme enough that it makes me think you're doing it to further provoke gender wars on this site.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Men can be great - I love the men in my life. You're just trying to fuel the gender wars to rile up discord here.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Men are upset that women feel the need to protect themselves against men.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 4 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

Population control and eugenics tend to be bad ideas.

I'm still convinced you're here to make feminists and women who support safety measures for other women look sexist with your "provocative" views on men.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 4 points 5 hours ago (8 children)

I think you're trolling and trying to make women who support this look sexist.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 0 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Almost like supporting safety measures for women doesn't mean I'm sexist against men lol

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago (11 children)

What in the 4B are your comments here?

view more: next ›