Not true, there are dozens of people who changed their mind, dozens!
zbyte64
joined 2 years ago
Ehh, we don't know because where is that 20 minute conversation she had with a detective documented? Also, if the intention was to harm Trump's image or whatnot, wouldn't a media circus be where to go with the story?
I'm skeptical they could do it in a way that meaningfully inherits stability from Linux. Imagine bolting on their service control on top of systemd or map their registry system to /etc. They either bring all the bad over to Linux or write something that doesn't support the windows ecosystem.
I'm going to call a spade a spade.
In the same spirit, Americans are more interested in telling themselves they are right than recognizing what is good.
If you don't like the competition then don't participate in said competition. Other people don't agree with you that it is an arbitrary rule and that's okay.
So you would say a godot competition is silly because it restricts developers from using other game engines? Now you're just being silly.
It's easier for a smart person to pretend to be dumb than a dumb person pretend to be smart. Similarly, a dumb person is easily fooled by AI into thinking it is smart.
Some people provide translated subtitles and the app does have a built in translator function. I found it's enough to converse, but definitely niche.
I haven't been banned yet, but then again I save all my shitposts for the fediverse and stick to book reviews on RedNote.
The rules being "idiotic" is a different issue from whether using pre-existing assets as placeholders is okay. For instance, one could argue that genAI, even during the concept phase, is an unfair advantage like taking steroids for a sports competition. For the purpose of fairness they have a blanket ban on genAI, not simply because "AI bad".
Like I said, when talking about morality you're talking about a subjective perception of value. All the other issues I mentioned, like them not following the rules, have objective criteria to say "yes they broke the rules". If your perception of authenticity includes gathering inspiration not from the originator but from a tool that samples art for you, then you would obviously conclude the end result is authentic. If however you define authenticity as something uniquely in the domain of the living, then they would not agree with you.
I mean chattel slavery requires rape at some point and the vast majority of the Founding Fathers were slave owners....