this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
86 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28499 readers
2039 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 46 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Of course not. We have only two choices of party:

  1. The Fascist party.

  2. The party that tells you to vote for them lest the Fascists win, but when elected, does nothing to fight the Fascists, reverse their worst atrocities, or prevent them from coming back to power.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Well, to be honest, if the choices between being fucked hard and fucked softly….

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 23 minutes ago

It's the same picture.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

when elected, does nothing to fight the Fascists, reverse their worst atrocities, or prevent them from coming back to power

Yep. If Democrats ever gain power again, watch them keep ICE pretty much the same way it is now, keep most of Trump's tariffs, not restore SNAP or USAID funding to previous levels, etc, etc, etc.

We just have to be grateful that the lesser evil party didn't add too many new atrocities before they calmly and politely cede power to the fascists again.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

Exactly. Could one of the blue MAGA folks let me know when Newsom publicly announces he supports completely dismantling DHS and rolling back the post-9/11 surveillance state? You cannot seriously pretend to want to fight fascism if dismantling the tools of the fascists isn't the first thing you intend to do when in power.

It has some serious Lord of the Rings vibes. The surveillance state and the unconstitutional powers created after 9/11 are this immensely powerful tool created for evil ends. But after the evil is defeated, the nominally good guys choose to not to dismantle the evil tools, but to keep them, telling themselves that they will be used for good. Except they cannot be used for good, as they are fundamentally evil. Meanwhile I'm over here shouting, "cast it into the fire!" But they decide to keep it every time.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

It's like you have absolutely no understanding of how the system actually works, and have chosen to ignore history.

The GOP is never going to cede one inch to the Dems on anything, ever. Obama picked the ACA plan because it was based on a GOP idea and they fought him tooth and nail until the final vote. Then they turned around and demanded the Supreme Court abolish it.

The only way you'll get any change under the current system is to elect a Dem super majority in every election for the next fifty years.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Obama picked the ACA plan because it was based on a GOP idea and they fought him tooth and nail until the final vote. Then they turned around and demanded the Supreme Court abolish it.

The only way you’ll get any change under the current system is to elect a Dem super majority in every election for the next fifty years.

They had a Dem supermajority during that time. And what did they do with it? They bent over backwards trying to 'reach across the aisle' and giving the GOP every single thing they asked for.

Expect the same thing if they come into power again.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

And what is your alternative?

What should we do in the 2026 elections?

Please provide a detailed plan.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Elect people who are running on assigning corruption charges instead of vibes

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 hours ago

As I said in my other post, elections will never fix it. Our power lies in General Strike.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

YOU have chosen to ignore history. And how typically in authoritarian takeovers, the first step to fighting the takeover is to abandon the captured opposition party and to start fresh with something new. A popular front is usually needed to defeat them. Authoritarians often let toothless opposition parties continue to operate. And there are always blind fools like yourself who insist that they must be supported, though they are just another tool of the autocrat.

The only way you’ll get any change under the current system is to elect a Dem super majority in every election for the next fifty years.

This shows you are not a serious person. If that is your solution, then I can only conclude that you actually support Trump and the Fascist party.

Democrats are not a real opposition party. They are the potemkin opposition, fully captured by the Fascists.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 8 points 4 hours ago

Dems right now are Fascist light not as crazy but fucking useless and on the same payroll as fascist full fat

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

So, what exactly is your plan for the 2026 election?

How exactly are you going to counter Trump?

Be specific and provide as many details as possible.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 9 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

You guys should do like the French, really. Revolt. Anything short of that won’t achieve shit.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 59 minutes ago

LA GUILLOTINE I LONG FOR LA GUILLOTINE

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm not American. Fix your own damned problems.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How brave of you to volunteer other people to attack the barricades.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Your people are threatening to invade my neighbouring country. Americans made this mess. Americans get to fix it.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry.

Trump

Always

Chickens

Out

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 6 points 4 hours ago

Trump isn’t the problem. Lop his head off and you’ll have achieved catharsis but it won’t be a solution to any problems. A lot more heads need to roll before anything is solved.

You can’t vote your way out of it because the system is built for those with money. You need to change the entire system and no one who is currently benefiting from that system will aid you in that.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Fuck elections. General strike until our demands are met.

Hold their precious 'economy' hostage while we still can -- before they replace us all with robots.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nice idea.

Now provide the details of how you do it.

It's easy to say things, not that easy to make them happen.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 hour ago

1: Gather a group of people. (I've got a few, need a lot more.)

2: Come up with a list of demands those people can mostly agree on. (I've got ideas, of course, but so does everybody. It's not my place to unilaterally decide what the strike's demands will be.)

3: Mutual aid networks to assist people who get fired from their jobs (or worse) in retaliation for participating in the strike. Build emergency caches of food, household essentials, arms, and medical supplies. Organize temporary shelter plans for anyone made homeless by participating in the strike. (I've got plenty of food to share if necessary, and I have a camper trailer in my back yard someone can stay in if necessary. And I've got a bunch of old lumber and building supplies I could slap together into some additional makeshift huts if really necessary -- they wouldn't have indoor plumbing, but they'd at least have a roof, walls, and heat. I could support 2 or 3 people easily. Maybe 5 to 10 in a pinch.)

4: Announce the strike. Begin withholding labor and minimizing all economic participation until the demands from Step 2 are met. (Not only refuse to sell your labor, but also refuse to buy anything, as much as possible. Also, for good measure, withdraw all your money from the bank so they can't collect interest on it.) (This does not mean that participants will 'do no work' and just sit around all day. You still have work -- supporting the strike. Work in a food kitchen to support those going hungry because they're on strike. Deliver food and supplies to strikers who can't make it to that kitchen. Build temporary shelters for strikers who need them. Provide security against the inevitable strike-busting violence. Etc.)

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, you're arguing in bad faith.

[–] lolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 58 minutes ago

Don’t feed the sea lions

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Satisfy my curiosity.

Exactly which words demonstrated by 'bad faith?'

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

Pot meet kettle. A Dem supermajority means nothing when they do nothing but play controlled opposition.