this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
848 points (90.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38133 readers
4910 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Veganism is such an elite issue like some people will fight everything except billionaires and the rich.

Veganism cant be and shouldnt be promoted especially in global south where children are still malnourished. Veganism also leads to dehumanization of certain cultures.

[–] Just_Lyin@lemmy.org 17 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets

I am not vegan. But I'm pretty sure if everyone switched to a plant-based diet it would require significantly less land usage. And thus we could more easily feed everyone. Including those malnourished children.

[–] gigajhand@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

do you really think people are malnourished because of insufficient land?

[–] Just_Lyin@lemmy.org 3 points 1 hour ago

The amount of available agricultural land is not a factor? I'm just pointing out that one is more efficient than the other. And will feed more people with a given available space.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

if everyone switched to a plant-based diet

I've never seen a plan to actually achieve this

[–] Just_Lyin@lemmy.org 3 points 1 hour ago

I didn't say it was feasible. Just knocking down an argument that meat is a better choice for feeding more people.

[–] xxd@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 hours ago

You know you can do both, right? Be vegan and fight billionaires. But I do somewhat agree that it is an elite issue, you do need to be in a somewhat privileged position to become vegan.

But also... who is promoting the global south to go vegan? As far as I'm aware, most vegans just try to get the people in generally developed countries to go vegan, as you have plenty of choices there, and most people are not fighting malnourishment.

And also, I think it's perfectly justified and not dehumanizing to critique cultures that promote (animal) abuse. Culture is a terrible justification for anything, if that thing is actually harmful.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

this study is too narrow to make such a claim

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How is it too narrow? They have considered data from more than 150 countries.

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

they only compared retail costs. they didn't account for people who get food for free or near free through poverty subsistence programs or hunting or fishing or farming their own. it basically didn't cover poor people at all.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Retail costs are still costs and plant based diets are globally around 30% cheaper than other diets. Where did I specify consumer (or any other particular) cost in my claim? Do you actually think the government giving free food means the food is cost free as well? Do you think self-sufficient people will affect the measure of the cost of food?

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

you didnt specify. you made a very broad claim which is not supported by the narrow study.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Specification is not needed, even you assumed these were retail costs from the get-go,

they only compared retail costs

on the next sentence you conflated retail costs with consumer cost

they didn’t account for people

which of course they didn't, retail costs will be the same even if the person getting the items isn't paying for them.

When someone says "this is 30% cheaper now", any reasonable person would understand that they're referring to the retail cost, not the consumer cost unless otherwise specified. Like "this is 30% cheaper on my food stamps".

[–] goedel@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 3 hours ago

it seems like you understand exactly what i'm saying, but you need to somehow paint yourself as right and me as wrong. fine.

have a nice day.

[–] JamBandFan1996@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think that's really true. Meat is a delicacy for poorer communities that are basically vegan due to only being able to afford cheap grains / vegetables

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

In my country where alot of children are malnourished and significant population is stunted Its not feasible nor realistic to shift to only veggies.

Alot of people here have easier access to meat than they do to vegetables because the amount of rabid capitalism that goes on that breaks both farmers and consumers benefiting the middlemen. People often cant grow their own veggies due to basically land being held by feudal lords, alot of poorer backward communities have relied on cattle for their living due to this.

The supposed upper caste and right wing extremists present eating meat as sin, they often lynch and harass minorities/backward groups who consume meat so it is hard for me to get in line with veganism.

Edit: I think veganism is not something to be pushed, it will come naturally when maybe we solve our other societal ills

[–] Just_Lyin@lemmy.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Well, that's a pretty abyssmal situation in your country and I'm sorry to hear that. I would not argue that not eating meat is better than malnourishment or starvation.