this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
622 points (97.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

30160 readers
1467 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] softwarist@programming.dev -2 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Because yaml is not a programming language, and debugging why your whatever you're configuring isn't working correctly can be a nightmare. It doesn't tell you you missed an indent on a block, it just assumes it should be there and changes the meaning.

Braces are visually clear.

[–] softwarist@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think YAML has its fair share of design flaws, but I don't think significant indentation is one of them. It may not be a programming language (which may be debatable), but there are plenty that use syntactic whitespace.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's not debatable... You linked to a programming language that uses yaml syntax, that didn't make yaml itself a programming language... It's not.

And I know there are plenty that use syntactic whitespace, and I hate that about all of them. Literally my only real frustration with python is due to the time of my life wasted debugging perfectly fine logic that fails because a few lines had incorrect indentation.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Because I am not counting white space when I read. Or should we just write machine code/assembler/pick something straight away?

[–] softwarist@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Not sure I'm following the jump from significant whitespace to machine code. How are those related?

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Human and machine read differently. If you ignore that (in case with indentation), then why bother with writing human-friendly form of code, when what is going to be really executed is something else?

[–] softwarist@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If anything, that sounds like an argument in favor of significant indentation, not against it. Humans and machines read differently, yes, which is why we tend to add whitespace and indentation to code even for programming languages where it's not significant. We do that expressly because it makes the code more human-friendly, so it's quite the opposite of ignoring their differences.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, it is an argument against it. We indent code so that it is more comfortable to read it, not in order to make it easier to understand

[–] softwarist@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're mistaken:

Indentation is a secondary notation that is often intended to lower cognitive load for a programmer to understand the structure of the code.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol. Go on, show me how it is easier to understand structure of the code when I am 3 levels down, first two are already out of sight

[–] softwarist@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not a coherent argument, but you don't have to agree with me. I think this discussion has run its course.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

What a nice way to say "I can't back my standpoint up". Anyway, do have a good day