politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Well...yes and no. If I recall well, little over 60% voted. Slightly more than half for trump. So a bit over 30% of the american voters voted for this shit. Those 40% that not voted.... They could have made a difference but did not bother
I have ~~a friend~~... A person I know, who is dating a good friend of mine. He's from California originally. He convinced my friend to not vote because Kamala had "bad policies" when she was an AG. Blah blah pot. Blah blah guns.. blah blah excuse.
Now he's vocal about Trump's policies, blah blah guns. Blah blah free speech, blah blah ICE.
I'm like mofo do you even hear yourself? She wasn't perfect. She made mistakes... But nope couldn't vote for the woman.
Shits infuriating.
It's perfectly legitimate to vote third party in a non-swing state to express your disgust with the state of The Democrats. However, doing that in a swing state is basically just punching yourself in the face.
In no case should you choose not to vote because that registers as apathy rather than disgust with the choices.
So they both voted for Trump. There's no debate. That's what happened.
A lot of people wanted to vote but couldn’t because they were purged off of voter rolls.
Slightly less than half
Nope. Less than half voted for Trump. He didn't even have a majority of people who cast a vote for president. And a third of the country isn't eligible to vote due to age.
So just under 20% of Americans voted for him.
The 40% that didn't vote would probably have also broke 50/50 for Trump vs. Harris if they'd bothered to vote. But, most of them probably live in states like Massachusetts or Wyoming where one party's lead is so huge that their vote really wouldn't have had any effect.
Stop deflecting and trying to blame non-voters when the real problem is the people who voted for Trump.
Every abstained vote is a vote for trump, so 68% of the country voted for Trump.
Asinine reasoning. If Harris had won, they'd all have been a vote for her.
But they didn't, and she didn't, so they weren't.
No, if literal Hitler is running in the election and you don't vote, the vote counts for Hitler.
Trust me when I say I have wrestled with this for a long time now, having to live among people who either voted for the fascists or didn't vote at all. There are a few key factors in the US that just don't make it that simple:
If you go from abstaining to voting for Trump, then you've voted twice!
They voted as a country. The country as an entity wanted Trump and it got him.
Only the losers in any election starts itemizing. I get it: Trump is about as legit as Hitler in terms of absolute percentage of people who voted for him vs. the entire pool of potential electors.
But that's not how it works: he won as per the rules of the elections, and now he's become the country's choice and its problem.
Fitting username.
To add: we've been voting on how our elections work since 2000. The problem was obvious then and we kept excusing candidates who support FPTP.