this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
1557 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11028 readers
1762 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Billionaires are the result of Capitalism, change the system, no more parasitic billionaires. Also chop off their heads.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We don't have to totally change the system. They can keep making billions of dollars, we can just tax 99% of it. Maybe they'll pay their employees more, if they know it's only going to get taxed away anyhow. And if they don't, well just take it from them.

[–] Xylian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes this is the answer. No single persons should have this much money. Instead collectives like governments, corps and holdings should have the money. By doing so the governments are also able to control money flow and restrict unethical use cases.

But this would require governments working for the people, people voting parties that are doing stuff for them and not for corruption. Also media outlets need a proper source of independent income to that opinion is not monopolized, which is the hardest in my opinion, because how most outlets are making money is by writing emotional articles so that they are clicked.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

My issue is when these people get so much money that they can start cutting personal deals with other nations that aren't in alignment with their own nation's values.

And what happens when a few trillionaires decide to form an alliance and create their own army, conquer territory, and create their own Libertarian Dream/Nightmare?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Billionaires" existed before capitalism, they were just called "Kings" or "Lords" or "Emperors" or "High Priests" or whatever.

The difference is that with capitalism at least they're producing something. Often they become billionaires because the regulations break down and they become monopolists. But, they're still producing something and selling it to someone.

"Billionaires" of the past were rich because they won the parental lottery and inherited vast amounts of land, and the people that worked that land. Or, occasionally, because they won a war against someone else who held land and now owned the people that other "billionaire" used to own.

I'm not saying capitalism is a great system. But, it didn't create wealth disparity. That has existed since even before agriculture. So, getting rid of capitalism isn't going to get rid of billionaires because they're a problem in every other system. In theory, you might not have billionaires under communism, but communism in theory doesn't seem to work. In practice, it results in billionaires too. In theory capitalism shouldn't have billionaires either because the government was supposed to regulate businesses to force them to continue to compete. But, wealth disparity is something that no political system has ever managed to actually get rid of.

[–] Koarnine@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's wealth disparity and then there's the wealth chasm of today, the disparity has grown so much in the last couple of decades beyond anything in human history.

The only reason it can is because of capitalism (neoliberalism, late stage capitalism).

The system incentivises and rewards the horrific behaviour that results in the disparity.

Also, pray tell, what are inheritocrats who made all their non-inherited money through stock markets producing?

As far as I can see, they're not producing anything, but are profiting off the backs of, and at the expense of, those that are producing the value.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

There's wealth disparity and then there's the wealth chasm of today,

You think the chasm today is as big as the gap between Augustus Caesar and a slave in Rome, or even a Roman plebian? Augustus Caesar's wealth is estimated at around $5 trillion in today's money.

The only way in which capitalism is responsible for wealth gaps is that it is tied to technological developments. In the modern world technology allows 1 farmer to feed hundreds of people. One century ago (also under capitalism) it was only about 4 people. More people who aren't farming means more labour to allocate to other things, which means more wealth can be concentrated at the top.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also chop off their heads.

That's where you lose. Keep it vague like "eat the rich"

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

The Fargo approach, then. Wood chipper.

[–] Beero@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] kablez@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

A bunch of nerds who only cared about perfection.

That way the idea can't be corrupted cause a nerd's obsession is more powerful than anything.

[–] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But what is perfection?

System version 1.7.586 is coming out tomorrow.

Still better than the bs we are all running now.

[–] Brummbaer@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

That's basically how the bureaucratic class aka. the states middle management works.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone but the ones doing it for profit.

I'd be up for a technocratie

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

And you think somehow the ones running it aren't going to concentrate wealth and power for themselves?

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

autonomous collective

seriously though, are you saying capitalism is the best humans can ever have?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Me, of course ^_^

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 0 points 1 day ago

Godlike AIs of course.