this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
1072 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11031 readers
2618 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Then vote in all elections including local, special, midterms and especially primaries not just general. Choose progressives.

We are where we are, because voter apathy. When you don't vote, other pick the candidates for you.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago

from what I hear, depending on the state, it's not easy to vote in the US.

  • In some places you have to reregister beforehand and you don't get a reminder
  • sometimes the next place to vote is far away
  • you have to bring a lot of papers
  • the election is during workhours on like a tuesday
  • there is a huge line and it's sometimes really hot out
  • even then sometimes they delete you from the list without notifying you

especially in southern states, primarily black neighborhoods districts have extra shitty conditions to prevent black people from voting

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have that voter apathy because our voting system is awful, and doesn't allow most votes to even matter. People should still vote, but that alone isn't enough to fix anything. As things are now it's damage control at best.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s bad, especially in the US and Canada, but not voting isn’t going to fix anything. Ultimately there are not hard-coded rules saying a progressive vote is worth less than a conservative one, even if the systems are set up to look that way. Voting is always worth it.

[–] hraegsvelmir@ani.social 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ultimately there are not hard-coded rules saying a progressive vote is worth less than a conservative one

There might not be rules explicitly for this purpose, but the Electoral College and Senate are hard-coded institutions in the US government that effectively guarantee this. The antagonism there is more framed as a rural vs urban one, but it effectively amounts to the same thing in practice. Going by Wikipedia numbers, every elector for NY represents the votes of up to 714,372 residents of New York, while in Wyoming, that ration is considerably lower, at 1 elector for every 196,251 residents. This ignores things like residents counted in the population who are ineligible to vote and people who just don't, but you get the point. Ditto for the Senate, where some 10 million New Yorkers get the same representation as just under 300,000 people in Wyoming.

Yes, rural states could eventually swing left again and make this no longer the case, but it certainly seems unlikely at any time in the near future.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Right, so you removed the reat of the sentence in that quote which agreed with that.

Specifically what I’m saying is that if people smarten up the system will change. The US is super close to being a dictatorship but the world saw Mamdani get elected all the same. There was a lot of power trying to get him to lose and he still won because he got the votes.

If people can vote and don’t because “it doesn’t matter” then they are a huge part of the problem and should be ashamed of themselves. Even if they lose for a few cycles, that support is crucially important to see on paper.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

You are confusing cause and effect. We have voter apathy because we are where we are. The vote-harder contingent has never once shown that it works. Every single president has presided over mass murder of innocent civilians. Every single party has approved or failed to stop mass murder. There has not been a single victory over racialized mass incarceration in 70 years. The US imprisons more of its people than almost any other country, and has a parole system twice as big as its prison system, meaning it manages the lives 3x more people with its police force than any other country on earth. It's unfathomably larger than anything the world has ever seen. It absolutely dwarfs the height of the GULAG system.

The system creates the apathy. The apathy doesn't create the system.

And I saw your other comment that not-voting won't make things better and that's true, but voting also won't make things better. So it's time to start thinking about what will make things better and time to stop funneling energy into a known ineffective solution.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Problem is in a lot of places those with the D next to their name aren't progressive with the only ones that actually are being third party. So not only do you have to convince a non-voter to vote, but you have to convince them to support someone that's not part of the 2 major parties.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's why he called out primaries

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 0 points 19 hours ago

Even in primaries there's just not an option. In my area everyone just tries to get right wing votes, including the Dems with many straight up just calling themselves conservatives that don't agree with the direction that party took. I've yet to see anyone every running to represent the party even on a small scale advocating for leftist values.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe but not enough. Given gerrymandering and swing states. Do I wish my states politicians were progressive? Of course and I’ll keep voting for them. But when it comes to national politics, my states politicians are blue and that won’t change either way, and it will not be paid attention to because we’re not a swing state

As long as my state is balanced by another I can’t affect, nothing is changing. No matter how progressive we may be, there’s always a West Virginia voting against healthcare, education, technology, jobs, the environment, livable wages, more protective safety nets, etc

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Wait is that Kang or Kronos