this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
428 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31093 readers
2581 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The mayor was inside the residence at the time, the police department said later Saturday

The NYPD’s Bomb Squad confirmed that the devices thrown in the direction of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s home were both viable IEDs.

The incident is now under investigation by both the NYPD and the FBI. In total, two devices were thrown during the protests on Saturday afternoon on Manhattan’s swanky Upper East Side.

On Sunday, police spokesperson Jessica Tisch said that the “preliminary analysis of a device that was ignited and deployed at a protest yesterday has determined that it is not a hoax device or a smoke bomb.”

“It is, in fact, an improvised explosive device that could have caused serious injury or death,” Tisch added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 64 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Timothy McVeigh did the OK city bombing, and he was a registered republican.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Uh, he also was obsessed with "The Turner Diaries", which is a neonazi novel.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

They already said Republican

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If that one was OK, I'd hate to see a really bad city bombing.

Can't tell if joke or doesn't know OK stands for Oklahoma in state abbreviations.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, my bad. I looked it up immediately after posting this comment and found my folly. Thought I deleted the comment, but since it has replies I'm going to leave it as is, as to not confuse anyone coming across this in the future.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You can edit the other post and "fix" the text with a note.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Would you prefer me to do that?

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It was just a note in case you didn't think about it.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No, I thought about it. Then I remembered the "deleted by creator" comments I've come across in the past. I just want honesty. Which not editing my comment kinda cements.

[–] northface@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

Some people clarifies their original post with new information by editing it but appending the additional text at the bottom, without changing the original text.

Prefixing the new information with "EDIT:" or similar is usually nice so as to separate the old from the new info.

I prefer this method as it saves people some time by not having to check the entire thread to see if someone else has pointed out an error they identified.