this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
308 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

82468 readers
4064 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm so sick of hearing about this, and seeing people who don't want to read get upset.

This is preemptively combating future federal crackdown by allowing Californians to TELL THE OS ANY BIRTH DATE THEY Want. No ID, no pictures of faces.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 12 points 15 hours ago

I'm tired of people falling for this kind of shit every single fucking time.

Authoritarianism is never passed through a bill overnight. It's one step in the wrong direction after another, multiplied N times.

This is a step in the wrong direction. After that you're one step away from "improving the verification" and you would reject that step only if you have nothing bad to hide.

Do you remember when it was only a few cameras to evaluate their efficiency? Now they're everywhere and are to use AI for behavior assessment and face recognition.

It's the same pattern every fucking time!

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Just because there's a workaround doesn't mean its fine for them to do.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't read I guess? This goes beyond the Californian bill. The NY bill specifically does not allow this.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

This specific article opens with the California bill being mentioned:

"The top line of California's Assembly Bill No. 1043 says: "AB 1043, Wicks. Age verification signals: software applications and online services." It was approved last October, but it's hit the headlines this week. In brief:"

Sorry if you live in NY, but I'm sick of seeing CA dragged through the mud. That's my beef here.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

CA should be dragged through the mud.

All these laws are creating footing to ease in more draconian laws in the future. Disgusting stuff

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

You should really read up on the law. That's just my opinion, though.