this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
99 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29576 readers
2189 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I know people who DONT PAY TAXES who want lower taxes. They are stupid and I want to scream.

I remember when I was about 9 or 10 or so, at a friend's house. They lived in a trailer. His dad worked a steady job, but didn't make much. Like everyone in that area, including my family.

Anyway, we are watching some local politicians debate on PBS, I think. Some young guy, coming off like a sleazy used-car dealer vs. a much older guy who seemed even-keeled (to me).

Friend's dad starts ranting about how the older guy will....RAISE HIS TAXES. Being a young kid, I'm not going to argue with the rage-o-holic father, but....what, raise his taxes five cents?

Years later, and the quips about "temporarily embarrassed millionaires" rings so true. I was surrounded by them.

And then there is the reactionary centrist (lol, yeah, right - the guy was most definitely Libertarian or Republican) that was playing all innocent and pretending to not even understand how biased it was to use the company email system to send out a tax calculator to the "all" distribution for some referendum to tell you how much it would "cost" you.

Dude really pretended to not understand that taking the time to send that on the company dime while not providing any information about the benefits of the measure was only half the story. He kept bleating about how "you can read the measure for that". If the guy was truly that thick about how uneven his "neutral" email was, I cannot even. But I think he knew what he was doing. He would bat his eyes at anyone that brought it up and act all hurt about how HR had to talk to him about it.