this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
864 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11207 readers
3238 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Um, no. I expected that one of two things would happen:

  1. A knowledge expert would come by and offer more detail and/or correction

  2. Nobody would care

Apparently, I should have prepared myself to be publicly shamed for trying to add to the conversation. Perhaps you missed the part where I said "...but this seems about right", and then offered my own analysis. My personal thoughts about the presidential administration that I fucking lived through, of articles I read in real time from a newspaper that was dropped at my door every fucking morning. You want me to source the Kansas City Star from 1976 -1980? Or my civics class in high school? Ted Brokaw? Dan Rather?

To you, Carter is ancient history. To me, he is a vivid living memory. I was a student during his administration; I remember his policies. His picture was hung in more than one classroom.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Setting aside how embarrassing this whole LLM thing is:

You want me to source the Kansas City Star from 1976 -1980?

That's 100% possible these days. I can't find jack shit to support the original statement after about 20 minutes of reading, and I don't know how you propose there's going to be anything but circumstantial evidence at best, but I guess it's better than copy–pasted bullshit from an LLM followed by "that sounds right in my anecdotal opinion".

Specifically, The Kansas City Star from 1976 to 1980 – the only thing you've cited that actually approximates a traceable source but that you apparently thought (practicably) wasn't – seems to have zero evidence that Carter's foreign policy on South Africa was even remotely controversial enough (let alone specifically not progressive enough) to have any meaningful impact on votes.

Articles on the subject are sparse – mainly the Associated Press who report South Africa's situation and sometimes (usually minimally) cover Carter's involvement. The opinions that do exist are basically neutral on Carter's involvement (and even if they weren't, we loop back to circumstantial evidence). Even looking specifically around the time of the election returns nothing. Having looked through several dozen articles across those four years, this is all routine coverage of international geopolitics. It's not even close.

Maybe you're misremembering. Maybe you thought I'd have to go spelunking through microfilm in a Kansas City library to call you on this. I'm assuming the former. Either way, I appreciate something tangible regardless of intent, even if it's wrong.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah...I forgot what the original statement was. But I just spent the last hour in an internet rabbit hole, reading about Carter's administration. Was fun, love ya, thanks for coming to the show.

I'll try to do better next time.